On Thursday, December 19, 2013 09:01:15 PM you wrote:
> V.Krishn writes ("Re: Need some guide with LSB core"):
> > I don't know how infeasible it sounds but if [2] above could be split to
> > another file, with some more params introduced like to use set -e or
>
V.Krishn writes ("Re: Need some guide with LSB core"):
> I don't know how infeasible it sounds but if [2] above could be split to
> another file, with some more params introduced like to use set -e or not...etc
> with its own language e.g
> http://lists.nongnu.org/arch
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh writes ("Re: Need some guide with LSB core"):
> Yes. And we do know better than provide system-wide shell script functions
> for initscript usage that croak under "set -e", so there is no such
> requirement for Debian.
>
>
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 09:55:21 PM Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Bas Wijnen writes ("Re: Need some guide with LSB core"):
> > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:27:45PM +0530, V.Krishn wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Bas Wijnen writes ("Re: Need some guide with LSB core"):
> > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:27:45PM +0530, V.Krishn wrote:
> > > Conforming scripts shall not specify the "exit on error" option (i.e.
> > > set -e)
Bas Wijnen writes ("Re: Need some guide with LSB core"):
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:27:45PM +0530, V.Krishn wrote:
> > Conforming scripts shall not specify the "exit on error" option (i.e.
> > set -e) when sourcing this file, or calling any of the commands thu
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 08:33:34 AM Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:27:45PM +0530, V.Krishn wrote:
> > On Friday, December 13, 2013 08:31:51 PM you wrote:
> > > Was going through LSB Core 4.1.
> > >
> > > I am looking at LSB core section 20.8 ...
> > >
> > > Confirming set
Bas Wijnen writes:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:27:45PM +0530, V.Krishn wrote:
>> Conforming scripts shall not specify the "exit on error" option (i.e.
>> set -e) when sourcing this file, or calling any of the commands thus
>> made available.
> From the bugs you cite, the consensus in Debian see
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:27:45PM +0530, V.Krishn wrote:
> On Friday, December 13, 2013 08:31:51 PM you wrote:
> > Was going through LSB Core 4.1.
> >
> > I am looking at LSB core section 20.8 ...
> >
> > Confirming set -e
> >
This is a useless quote. You mean:
> Conforming scripts shall
On Friday, December 13, 2013 08:31:51 PM you wrote:
> Was going through LSB Core 4.1.
>
> I am looking at LSB core section 20.8 ...
>
> Confirming set -e
>
>
> does this mean /etc/init.d/apache2 will not have "set -e" set in it
> or
> the file /lib/lsb/init-functions should not have it ?
>
Was going through LSB Core 4.1.
I am looking at LSB core section 20.8 ...
Confirming set -e
does this mean /etc/init.d/apache2 will not have "set -e" set in it
or
the file /lib/lsb/init-functions should not have it ?
coz I see set -e in /etc/init.d/apache2
I am using debian/knoppix (7.2
11 matches
Mail list logo