On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:36:14PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> but what fact are these fears based in? would the nsa really plop a backdoor
> in an opensource project, hoping it missed and accepted with the rest of the
> code? i doubt it. their whole (advertised) motive was to protect against the
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> from the secret journal of Britton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > Pardon my paranoia, but even if it was worth making all the changes they
> > are talking about (which are pretty extensive), I'd want to see anything
> > coming from the NSA audited carefully
from the secret journal of Britton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Pardon my paranoia, but even if it was worth making all the changes they
> are talking about (which are pretty extensive), I'd want to see anything
> coming from the NSA audited carefully before being included.
>
> Britton Kerin
you're
Pardon my paranoia, but even if it was worth making all the changes they
are talking about (which are pretty extensive), I'd want to see anything
coming from the NSA audited carefully before being included.
Britton Kerin
__
GNU GPL: "The Source will be with you... always."
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, J
from the secret journal of Buddha Buck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >unless we have a policy against security, it should be fine. :) it's all
> >gpl.
i posted that before i hit the download page.
> >Security-enhanced Linux is not an attempt to correct any flaws that may
> >currently exist in Linux. In
At 04:38 PM 12-22-2000 -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
from the secret journal of Brent Fulgham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> No doubt most of you have seen the NSA's secure linux posting
> on Slashdot this morning.
>
> Looking at:
> http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/docs.html
>
> there appears to be several utilities
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Brent Fulgham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>No doubt most of you have seen the NSA's secure linux posting
>on Slashdot this morning.
>
>Looking at:
>http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/docs.html
>
>there appears to be several utilities that have been updated
>to provide enhanc
from the secret journal of Brent Fulgham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> No doubt most of you have seen the NSA's secure linux posting
> on Slashdot this morning.
>
> Looking at:
> http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/docs.html
>
> there appears to be several utilities that have been updated
> to provide enhanced s
No doubt most of you have seen the NSA's secure linux posting
on Slashdot this morning.
Looking at:
http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/docs.html
there appears to be several utilities that have been updated
to provide enhanced security.
Should we be merging these patches into Debian, assuming they
appear
9 matches
Mail list logo
