On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 03:06:55PM -0500, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> The second reason I chose to cut a lot of NMU changelogs was that you
> took it upon yourself to load them with vindictive, personal and
> unprofessional statements.
Editing changelogs is `modifying history' - do not do that.
-
Woah. Calm down, everyone!
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:28:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 03:06:55PM -0500, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> > Well Ben, there are two reasons that I ignored the NMUs.
> >
> > The first reason is that Kaffe revisions have been so long in coming
I refuse to continue this discussion on devel. Move it to -java where it
belongs.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:28:03PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> Good job Ean. You've done an excellent job of maintaining a quality
> package.
--
_
On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 03:06:55PM -0500, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> Well Ben, there are two reasons that I ignored the NMUs.
>
> The first reason is that Kaffe revisions have been so long in coming that
> the 1.0.6 source base bears little to no resembelence to the 1.0.5
> source. Maintaining th
Well Ben, there are two reasons that I ignored the NMUs.
The first reason is that Kaffe revisions have been so long in coming that
the 1.0.6 source base bears little to no resembelence to the 1.0.5
source. Maintaining the patches that were done against 1.0.5 would be
difficult at best and I was mo
(Ean, you are Cc'd just in case you aren't sub'd to -devel, please feel
free to denote otherwise to avoid duplicates)
Over the course of potato release, there were several NMU's done on the
kaffe package to fix some RC bugs. I've listed them here for clarity and
reference:
59420: kaffe_1:1.0.5e-0
6 matches
Mail list logo
