Re: Multi-User X machine (Was: runlevels remodeled)

2005-08-15 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:50:41PM +0200, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > wasnt it me who included the interesting patches into the > *debian* kernel a year ago? Depends if you want multiseat X or multiseat VTs, but hearty congratulations in any case. Well done. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR

Re: Multi-User X machine (Was: runlevels remodeled)

2005-08-15 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-16 01:09:53]: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [Steinar H. Gunderson] > > > How do you make this work? Last time I tried it, X would only show > > > the one connected to the ???active??? virtual console, and blan

Re: Multi-User X machine (Was: runlevels remodeled)

2005-08-15 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 06:19:08PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Daniel Stone] > > Ubuntu implements this from the installer down (although only for > > the special cases of four nVidia, MGA, or ATI cards, and even then > > you may need to fiddle with the configuration a little bit), with a

Re: Multi-User X machine (Was: runlevels remodeled)

2005-08-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Daniel Stone] > Ubuntu implements this from the installer down (although only for > the special cases of four nVidia, MGA, or ATI cards, and even then > you may need to fiddle with the configuration a little bit), with a > bunch of patches to xorg -- no kernel patches required. Those > patches ar

Re: Multi-User X machine (Was: runlevels remodeled)

2005-08-15 Thread Daniel Stone
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 02:59:17PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Steinar H. Gunderson] > > How do you make this work? Last time I tried it, X would only show > > the one connected to the ???active??? virtual console, and blanked > > the other. > > It need some patches to the kernel and X.

Multi-User X machine (Was: runlevels remodeled)

2005-08-15 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Steinar H. Gunderson] > How do you make this work? Last time I tried it, X would only show > the one connected to the ???active??? virtual console, and blanked > the other. It need some patches to the kernel and X. I'm not sure how many of these are included in the mainstream kernel and X implem