Re: More accurate package classification

2006-11-02 Thread George Danchev
On Thursday 02 November 2006 12:36, Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote: > Hi all Hello, > Sometimes I spend hours just reading Debian's package repository, and > everytime I found interesting packages. The Debian is extremely large > and juicy, but in contrary, it is really difficult sometimes to ju

Re: More accurate package classification

2006-11-02 Thread Thomas Perl
Hello, Peter! On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:36:48 +0100 Mgr. Peter Tuharsky wrote: > More and more, I miss some more accurate system for package > classification. > [...] > I'm sure something like that has already been discussed. I'm just > adding, that such kind of structure is NECESSARRY for such a g

Re: More accurate package classification

2006-11-02 Thread Michal Čihař
Hi On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:36:48 +0100 "Mgr. Peter Tuharsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example, just the cathegories "X11" and "GNOME" both contain bunch > of excellent software of many kinds. The same goes for other cathegories > too -sound, video,... > > New sub-cathegories should be c

More accurate package classification

2006-11-02 Thread Mgr. Peter Tuharsky
Hi all Sometimes I spend hours just reading Debian's package repository, and everytime I found interesting packages. The Debian is extremely large and juicy, but in contrary, it is really difficult sometimes to just find the "right" tool when needed. More and more, I miss some more