On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Thimo Neubauer wrote:
> Sorry to interrupt your speculations about a gnuplot menu-entry but
> it's been in the package for ages (about 1997)... Yes, opening a xterm
> with the gnuplot commandline inside is a bit strange but nobody ever
> complained and at least it can be found
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:26:55AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every
> > > program which has a user interface.
> >
> > I "vote" that you get to write the men
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > I "vote" that you get to write the menu file for gnuplot, which after
> > all has a graphical user interface, if it's fed the proper data file.
>
> Or fix my bug http://bugs.debian.org/139482
>
> I need a dialog utility to prompt for the file name
On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Joey Hess wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> > In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every
> > program which has a user interface.
>
> I "vote" that you get to write the menu file for gnuplot, which after
> all has a graphical user interface, if it's
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Tille wrote:
> > In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every
> > program which has a user interface.
>
> I "vote" that you get to write the menu file for gnuplot, which after
> all has a graphical user interface, if it's
Andreas Tille wrote:
> In fact you are right. I would vote for a mandatory menu entry for every
> program which has a user interface.
I "vote" that you get to write the menu file for gnuplot, which after
all has a graphical user interface, if it's fed the proper data file.
--
see shy jo, handin
On Aug 15, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Is it reasonable to require that source packages ship a
> .desktop.in file and manage translations with PO files?
For Debian-specific menu entries, this would be a reasonable
requirement, as it would for any menu entries being adapted from an
upstream project that
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 04:18:59PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
[...]
> If this is something that is actually important for translation
> in general, the place to take it up is the XDG working group;
> however, KDE and GNOME seem (IMO) to take translation seriously,
> and they have not proposed suc
8 matches
Mail list logo
