On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 05:45:05PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote:
> Is there a convenient way to put a package on hold? I couldn't
> figure anything out form the dpkg and apt-get manpages. If I
> have to start dselect every time I want to put something on hold
> this is certainly not how it should be. (
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 12:04:20PM -0400, Robert D. Hilliard wrote:
> Despite the disclaimer about error checking, I have had good
> results with it.
just paranoia. i've never had a problem with it. the message is there
mostly to let people know that it's the kind of tool which makes it real
eas
Arthur Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a convenient way to put a package on hold? I couldn't
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> included the following in a
message dated Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:43:53 +1000:
> #! /bin/bash
>
> # dpkg-hold -- command line tool to flag package(s)
Hello.
Alisdair McDiarmid schrieb:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 01:49:13PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > you always have the option of using 'apt-get source' to recompile a package,
> > then place it on hold and we wont touch it.
>
> I've tried doing this occasionally -- more often to chang
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 01:49:13PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> >
> > So, is there any plan to use them (like recompiling the package on the
> > user's
> > machine)?
> >
>
> you always have the option of using 'apt-get source' to recompile a package,
> then place it on hold and we wont t
>
> So, is there any plan to use them (like recompiling the package on the user's
> machine)?
>
you always have the option of using 'apt-get source' to recompile a package,
then place it on hold and we wont touch it.
Beyond that, it gets very messy. Not to mention the disk usage.
Users who in
On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 05:34:01PM -0300, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> So, is there any plan to use them (like recompiling the package on the user's
> machine)?
Yes, that is the plan. No, there is no other plan.
(Why can't we have cool undying threads like, I don't know, katanas?)
--
David St
I know this theme has been repeated a lot here, but I still think that using
machine-specific optimizations can make a difference. Specifically, there are a
few packages (libgmp, gnupg, bzip2) where it could make a lot of difference.
Some packages use every tiny bit of extra compiler optimization
8 matches
Mail list logo
