Re: ML improvement proposition (Re: SMTP 550 on replies to bugs)

2007-09-18 Thread Oleg Verych (Gmane)
* 18-09-2007, Bernd Zeimetz * User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070828 Thunderbird/2.0.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 > >> * Allow messages, that have "In-reply-to" and "References" with valid >> message-id's (SHOULD in rfc2822) to pass to bts/ml freely. > > Why? This

Re: ML improvement proposition (Re: SMTP 550 on replies to bugs)

2007-09-18 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
> * Allow messages, that have "In-reply-to" and "References" with valid > message-id's (SHOULD in rfc2822) to pass to bts/ml freely. Why? This can be faked easily, getting them together with a destination email address should be pretty easy for spammers. > * Opening new threads in MLs requires

ML improvement proposition (Re: SMTP 550 on replies to bugs)

2007-09-17 Thread Oleg Verych (Gmane)
(-devel was added in case if somebody is interested) 06-09-2007, Don Armstrong: > On Thu, 06 Sep 2007, Oleg Verych (Gmane) wrote: >> Should i reopen/post/close? Or additional info just not needed for >> "thousands of users and indexing search engines"? > > If there's a valid reason to add more inf