Neil Williams wrote:
[...]
> With the caveats already covered in this thread (excepting kdelibs), are
> there objections to a MBF for this outdated Release Goal? We've already
> missed this Release Goal once, probably because no bugs were filed
> first time around.
[...]
Hello,
I have also tagge
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:41:37AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > > This apparently just isn't true. I could have sworn that we had a
> > > > check,
> > > > but we apparently do not. We definitely should. That's probably why
> > > > there are so many problems; I suspect a lot of them would g
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:12:42 -0700
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:33:24PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > >> Lintian already checks that *.la files don't contain the problematic
> > > >> dependency_libs setting.
>
> > > This apparently just isn't true. I could have sworn th
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 07:33:24PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > >> Lintian already checks that *.la files don't contain the problematic
> > >> dependency_libs setting.
> > This apparently just isn't true. I could have sworn that we had a check,
> > but we apparently do not. We definitely shou
On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 10:49:04 -0700
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Neil Williams writes:
> > The line in the original data is:
>
> > shibboleth-sp2: dependency_libs links-not-existing-la
>
> > The original criteria were:
>
> > 1. "no flag" to remove the la-file on next occasion
>
> > 2. only "depende
5 matches
Mail list logo
