On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 02:00:30AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:31:03PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > maint-guide (U): has RC bugs (#403200)
>
> This is nanother package hit by cjk-latex change during etch testing.
>
> It i
> Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> localization-config (U): in unstable (1.0) but not in testing.
Not in testing on purpose. localization-config is not suitable for
release. At the moment it was updated/uploaded, there was some hope
that it could be useful for D-I but it finally turns ou
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:31:03PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> maint-guide (U): has RC bugs (#403200)
This is nanother package hit by cjk-latex change during etch testing.
It is FTBFS, I agree in etch but fault is latex-cjk-* packages, I think.
And issue
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> checkinstall: in unstable (1.6.1-1) but not in testing.
This package had an RC bug until 1.6.1-1, which was uploaded on Dec 7th. I
am at least waiting for the regular 10 days in unstable before requesting a
hint into etch.
--
Felip
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Amaya Rodrigo Sastre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> amaya (U): in unstable (9.51-2.1) but not in testing.
I was removed from testing!? Are you guys releasing without me? :)
> twiki (U): has RC bugs (#402817)
This has been fixed, and there is also a security upload in the way,s
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 23:31:03 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> rageircd: in unstable (2.0.1-5) but not in testing.
Kindly refer to #395345, filed against ftp.debian.org 50 days ago with
no reaction of ftpmaster whatsoever.
Greetings
Marc
--
On 16/12/06 at 02:15 +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a list (sorted by maintainer email) of packages:
> > - that have RC bugs
> > - that are in unstable, but not in testing
> >
> > Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > clamav
On 16/12/06 at 00:21 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> > I wonder what making a list of packages in Unstable but not in Testing is
> > supposed to accomplish. Every maintainer in such a situation knows about it
> > and if they want the'll do something about it like emaili
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Carlo Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
libtk-png-perl (U): in unstable (2.005-3) but not in testing.
A request for removal (#389676) has been filed as this is now included in
perl-tk.
Carlo
--
Carlo U. Segre -- Professor of Physics
Associate Dean for
This one time, at band camp, Lucas Nussbaum said:
> Hi,
>
> Here is a list (sorted by maintainer email) of packages:
> - that have RC bugs
> - that are in unstable, but not in testing
>
> Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> clamav (U): has RC bugs (#401873, #403034)
> Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTEC
Oleksandr Moskalenko wrote:
> I wonder what making a list of packages in Unstable but not in Testing is
> supposed to accomplish. Every maintainer in such a situation knows about it
> and if they want the'll do something about it like emailing RMs.
Yes, especially if the false posivitive count is
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Hi,
>
>Here is a list (sorted by maintainer email) of packages:
>- that have RC bugs
>- that are in unstable, but not in testing
>
>(U) means "Uploader".
>
>Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> motifnls: in unstable (2.1-9) but not in testing.
I've also
12 matches
Mail list logo
