Aron Xu dixit:
>You might be interested in reading this thread:
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/06/msg00149.html
Ok, will have a look, thanks.
>Activating LTO by default seems not to be a reasonable idea (reasons
Right, it is not.
>are in the given thread), but if maintainer of a pa
Hi Thorsten,
You might be interested in reading this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/06/msg00149.html
Activating LTO by default seems not to be a reasonable idea (reasons
are in the given thread), but if maintainer of a package see it's
appropriate then he can use it in the pack
Hi all,
has anyone ever wondered about adoption of LTO in Debian?
I’ve been using -fwhole-program --combine since GCC supported
it somewhat reliably (with a fallback as they have broken it
regularily at least three times) in mksh, and now several of
my packages try -flto=jobserver with a fallback
3 matches
Mail list logo
