* Felipe Sateler [Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:58:23 +1100]:
> > * plan for libjack0.100.0-0: there are 11 source packages left with
> > dependencies on this old library. No sourceful uploads are needed
> > for this: once you’ve gotten back to me that the plan is good, I
> > will provide you with
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 02:19, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Maintainers: unless you’re jackbeat or gst-plugins-bad0.10, you need not
> upload for this, though build-depending on libjack-dev in your next
> upload would be nice.
>
> ---
>
> Hello, Felipe. I finally found some time to look at your message.
Maintainers: unless you’re jackbeat or gst-plugins-bad0.10, you need not
upload for this, though build-depending on libjack-dev in your next
upload would be nice.
---
Hello, Felipe. I finally found some time to look at your message. I’ve
moved -release to CC (thanks for the Bcc!), since it’s on-t
Le lundi 23 mars 2009 à 23:30 +1100, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
> > No problem here. But objdump -p /usr/bin/creox | grep jack shows NEEDED
> > libjack-0.100.0.so.0, that's where the linker looks.
>
> But why use the field when linking, and not use it when loading the shared
> object? I fail to se
[No need to CC me, thanks]
El 23/03/09 23:17 Samuel Thibault escribió:
> Felipe Sateler, le Mon 23 Mar 2009 23:02:00 +1100, a écrit :
> > [1] This actually surprised me. Could someone explain to me why are there
> > SONAMEs when they are not actually used?
>
> They are used when linking a program,
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 23 Mar 2009 13:17:36 +0100, a écrit :
> No problem here. But objdump -p /usr/bin/creox | grep jack shows NEEDED
> libjack-0.100.0.so.0, that's where the linker looks.
Oops, here, by linker I mean ld.so, not ld.
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@li
Felipe Sateler, le Mon 23 Mar 2009 23:02:00 +1100, a écrit :
> [1] This actually surprised me. Could someone explain to me why are there
> SONAMEs when they are not actually used?
They are used when linking a program, to know which NEEDED should be
put.
> % ldd /usr/bin/creox | grep jack
>
Fellow developers and release team (bcc'ed),
The Debian Multimedia Maintainers would like to drop the versioned jack
library and development packages (that is, libjack0.100.0-{0,dev}). They were
introduced a long time ago (along with the appropriately renamed library) due
to perceived instabilit
8 matches
Mail list logo
