Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm still alive, I'm not lost ;-)
You're not dead, which is the most important ;-)
> And that's the problem where I was stuck.
>
> The dependencies of the current experimental python1.5 packages aren't
> good enough to allow an easy upgrade from
Gregor Hoffleit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How does that sound ?
I think it sounds like an awful lot of work. I still don't really
understand why we keep python1.5, but presumably there are some good
reasons, and I trust the debian team to have thrashed that out by now.
You mentioned emacs, w
* Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010904 11:18]:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ...
> > in June (2.1) and July (2.1.1). Gregor (the python-1.5 and python-2.0
> > maintainer) has put experimental packages at
> > http://people.debian.org/~flight/python and was asking for help
>
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> in June (2.1) and July (2.1.1). Gregor (the python-1.5 and python-2.0
> maintainer) has put experimental packages at
> http://people.debian.org/~flight/python and was asking for help
> regarding the packaging (20010801). Jérôme Marant answered (2001
As David Maslen pointed out in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2001/debian-python-200109/msg0.html
Debian doesn't have yet python-2.1 in it's distro, although released
in June (2.1) and July (2.1.1). Gregor (the python-1.5 and python-2.0
maintainer) has put experimental packages at
http:/
5 matches
Mail list logo