Re: InaTux's "Author's Choice of Terminology License"

2009-06-07 Thread Robert Collins
On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 01:10 -0700, oohay moc. wrote: > Hello, > ... > Had the license been completed. Would they've/you've considered it? Seems non-free to me. -Rob signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Re: InaTux's "Author's Choice of Terminology License"

2009-06-07 Thread oohay moc.
on I have is the link to the license at inatux.com that I already posted. --- On Sun, 6/7/09, Ben Finney wrote: From: Ben Finney Subject: Re: InaTux's "Author's Choice of Terminology License" To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Cc: debian-le...@lists.debian.org Date: Sunday, Ju

Re: InaTux's "Author's Choice of Terminology License"

2009-06-07 Thread Ben Finney
"oohay moc." writes: > So! I was wondering what the community at large, and hopefully the > main Debian developers, think about InaTux's "Author's Choice of > Terminology License"? You can find it here: > http://www.inatux.com/actl/ It's much mor

InaTux's "Author's Choice of Terminology License"

2009-06-07 Thread oohay moc.
Hello, I have sent an email to Richard Stallman asking a similar question, no response. So! I was wondering what the community at large, and hopefully the main Debian developers, think about InaTux's "Author's Choice of Terminology License"? You can find it here: http:/