Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon 05 Oct 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 05-Oct-98 Paul Slootman wrote:
> > > Do you really mean _all_ other packages? AFAIK you can have libjpegg6a
> > > and libjpeg6b installed together (I didn't find a libjpegg6b package).
> > > Additionall
I package chameleon, and it was created BEFORE imlib-config existed. But yes,
as you can see the -lImlib works for me. Would some of you test compiling w/
Imlib and actually using the gfx libs. I have seen it compile OK, but then
fail to load png's and jpegs (the two biggest offenders).
On Mon 05 Oct 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 05-Oct-98 Paul Slootman wrote:
> >
> > Do you really mean _all_ other packages? AFAIK you can have libjpegg6a
> > and libjpeg6b installed together (I didn't find a libjpegg6b package).
> > Additionally, isn't it that so that those packages that us
Shaleh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I 100% agree w/ you. Now make it work (-: I have compiled Imlib on
> my own box and I can link w/ only -lImlib. However every other
> person I know of, linux or otherwise needs to use the -l libs.
> Imlib is merely a common interface to the gfx libs. It hide
I 100% agree w/ you. Now make it work (-: I have compiled Imlib on my own box
and I can link w/ only -lImlib. However every other person I know of, linux or
otherwise needs to use the -l libs. Imlib is merely a common interface to
the gfx libs. It hides the jpeg, png, etc.
Seriously, make it
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
> > Let's do something compatible with Red Hat (unless there are good
> > reasons not to). Synchronizing SONAMEs is one of the goals of the
> > LSB. If we are going to switch to libjpeg62 - let'
Jim Pick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > libjpeg6b is broken and shouldn't be used by any new packages. It
> > > doesn't respect the upstream maintainers choice of soname, namely
> > > libjpeg.so.62, and hence makes Debian incompatible with Red Hat
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 10:57:25AM -0700, Jim Pick wrote:
> Let's do something compatible with Red Hat (unless there are good
> reasons not to). Synchronizing SONAMEs is one of the goals of the
> LSB. If we are going to switch to libjpeg62 - let's do so before the
> freeze.
Alright. Who wants to
> Let's do something compatible with Red Hat (unless there are good
> reasons not to). Synchronizing SONAMEs is one of the goals of the
> LSB. If we are going to switch to libjpeg62 - let's do so before the
> freeze.
>
Agreed Jim. Would the libjpeg maintainer care to step up and explain why a
Brian Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > libjpeg6b is broken and shouldn't be used by any new packages. It
> > doesn't respect the upstream maintainers choice of soname, namely
> > libjpeg.so.62, and hence makes Debian incompatible with Red Hat.
> > (RedHat does use the the upstream soname.
On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 01:03:10PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote:
> Please people, don't upload NMUs without at least trying to discuss it
> with the developer. If I wanted to deal with "anyone can upload a new
> version anytime he/she feels like it", I would be making RPMS.
That was the main thrust o
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun 04 Oct 1998, Brian Almeida wrote:
>
> > I just talked to Shaleh, the previous Imlib maintainer. It was
> > intentional to use libjpegg6a for imlib. 6a and 6b do not play
> > well together. Your NMU
> Is it necessary that they play _together_
I am afraid that every Imlib using app is link w/ -ljpeg. Hence all of GNOME,
wmaker-conf, Enlightenment, Eterm, chameleon, perl-imlib, python-imlib, and
Fnlib will all break from the 6a->6b change.
Tynian is going to begin the 6b move over last I spoke to him. All package
maintainers will be gi
On 05-Oct-98 Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Sun 04 Oct 1998, Brian Almeida wrote:
>
>> I just talked to Shaleh, the previous Imlib maintainer. It was intentional
>> to
>> use libjpegg6a for imlib. 6a and 6b do not play well together. Your NMU
>
> Is it necessary that they play _together_ ?
>
>> b
On Sun 04 Oct 1998, Brian Almeida wrote:
> I just talked to Shaleh, the previous Imlib maintainer. It was intentional to
> use libjpegg6a for imlib. 6a and 6b do not play well together. Your NMU
Is it necessary that they play _together_ ?
> breaks every Imlib-using GNOME package out there. Th
I just talked to Shaleh, the previous Imlib maintainer. It was intentional to
use libjpegg6a for imlib. 6a and 6b do not play well together. Your NMU
breaks every Imlib-using GNOME package out there. Therefore I am overriding
it. Please go through the correct channels next time, instead of goi
16 matches
Mail list logo
