Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels]

2005-03-25 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le jeudi 24 mars 2005 à 11:13 +1100, Matthew Palmer a écrit : > "Some would say that this has already happened". Not a fork, per se, > but Ubuntu's licencing policy (and the general level-headedness of the > people I know who are deeply involved in it) suggests that it may be > the refuge you seek

Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels]

2005-03-24 Thread Thomas Hood
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 08:50:16 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Is it as easy to participate with Ubuntu as it is with Debian? In some respects it is easier. For one thing you can become a maintainer there without going through an NM ordeal. -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels]

2005-03-24 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 08:49:39AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:13:05 +1100, Matthew Palmer > >"Some would say that this has already happened". Not a fork, per se, but > >Ubuntu's licencing policy (and the general level-headedness of the people I > >know who are deeply involve

Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels]

2005-03-23 Thread Marc Haber
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 11:13:05 +1100, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:29:35AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: >> On Thursday 24 March 2005 03:40, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > If the free software fanatics succeed in kicking non-free from being >> > s

Re: If Debian's too radical for you... [was: NEW handling: About rejects, and kernels]

2005-03-23 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 10:29:35AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote: > On Thursday 24 March 2005 03:40, Theodore Ts'o <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If the free software fanatics succeed in kicking non-free from being > > supported by Debian assets, such that the FSF documentation were no > > longer avai