On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 12:08:59PM -0700, A.J. Rossini wrote:
> Just for the record, some of us use CATI to get information from
> subjects (voluntary participation) who can not come to a research site
> for various reasons .
i have no problem at all with voluntary participation in surveys or
ma
> "CS" == Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CS> On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:22:11PM -0500, Chris Lawrence
CS> wrote:
>> For the unfamiliar, CATI programs are used to to conduct
>> surveys over the telephone (although they can also be used in
>> other contexts). Thi
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 10:12:50AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> me or find another public forum more to your tastes. if what i say is
> objectionable to enough other people then it is i who will have to find a
> forum which tolerates me.
Since you offered, and since I am a part of this publi
On Oct 04, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > cold calls are annoying regardless of their purpose. sales calls are
> > especially annoying, but that doesn't excuse academic or market research
> > surveys.
>
> Yes. What I find acceptable are snail mail surveys. Those can be easily
> ignored, and are paid
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 07:29:15PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 08:13:02AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > it may be an important tool, but that doesn't give you or anyone else
> > the right to pester people in their own homes. it really does no good
> > to apologise or even
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 01:02:55AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 08:13:02AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > even opt-out lists are the wrong solution...because they don't work very
> > well (especially when usage of them is optional). telephone pests should
> > be limited
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 08:13:02AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> it may be an important tool, but that doesn't give you or anyone else
> the right to pester people in their own homes. it really does no good
> to apologise or even to promise not to call back - by that time, the
> damage has been don
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 08:13:02AM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> even opt-out lists are the wrong solution...because they don't work very
> well (especially when usage of them is optional). telephone pests should
> be limited to calling ONLY an opt-in list, people who are willing to
> receive unsol
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 10:50:06PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Oct 03, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > IMO, this is morally akin to writing free software specifically to make
> > spamming cheaper and easier.
>
> No, it isn't. Survey research is an important part of the social
> sciences.
it may
On Oct 02, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Oct 03, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:22:11PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> >
> > > For the unfamiliar, CATI programs are used to to conduct surveys over
> > > the telephone (although they can also be used in other contexts).
> > > Think
On Oct 03, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:22:11PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
>
> > For the unfamiliar, CATI programs are used to to conduct surveys over
> > the telephone (although they can also be used in other contexts).
> > Think of an "installation wizard" with a modem dia
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:22:11PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> For the unfamiliar, CATI programs are used to to conduct surveys over
> the telephone (although they can also be used in other contexts).
> Think of an "installation wizard" with a modem dialer and database
> backend, and you've got
I intend to write and package a free computer assisted telephone
interviewing (CATI) application for Linux; there appears to be no free
CATI software in the universe, and what CATI software there is is
extremely overpriced (per-seat licensing), runs on certain operating
systems that aren't free pro
13 matches
Mail list logo