Re: ITP enhydra

On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:22:41PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > If the package is in 'non-free', you don't even need the > > sources. IMHO (but IANAL), for a package to get in 'main', you HAVE > > TO be able to compile it

Re: ITP enhydra

[CCed to: debian-java, where this thread originated the wnpp bug for Enhydra debian-devel, to get broader input on source packaging issues Please trim CC list as appropriate] On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > If the package is in 'non-

Re: ITP enhydra

On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > I intend to package Enhydra, an open source Java/XML application server Fine! Because I'm currently in the process of searching a reasonable content management system. Is there anybody who could draw a short comparison between enhydra and zope aor may

Re: ITP enhydra

On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 03:05:04PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > I intend to package Enhydra, an open source Java/XML application server > . It is licensed as > follows (according to

ITP enhydra

Package: wnpp Severity: normal I intend to package Enhydra, an open source Java/XML application server . It is licensed as follows (according to ): Base Enhydra server and tools: FreeBSD license XMLC co