Re: ITP: kernel-patch-selinux

2001-09-25 Thread Manoj Srivastava
>>"John" == John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> First of all, I doubt that you're going to have too much John> trouble getting a response from SElinux. They've been pretty John> good on responding to their mailinglist I had sent in an informal request for clarification to the

Re: ITP: kernel-patch-selinux

2001-09-24 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:12, John Galt wrote: > First of all, I doubt that you're going to have too much trouble getting a > response from SElinux. They've been pretty good on responding to their > mailinglist: which, I might add, I see more than one Debian Developer has > contributed to, yet you ha

Re: ITP: kernel-patch-selinux

2001-09-24 Thread John Galt
First of all, I doubt that you're going to have too much trouble getting a response from SElinux. They've been pretty good on responding to their mailinglist: which, I might add, I see more than one Debian Developer has contributed to, yet you have not. It would behoove you to actually look as i

Re: ITP: kernel-patch-selinux

2001-09-24 Thread John Hasler
Russell Coker wrote: > I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux. > Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below license > details (copied from the web site) is that the kernel patch is under the GPL > and everything is fine. > However is the

Re: ITP: kernel-patch-selinux

2001-09-24 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > > I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux. > > > > Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below > > license > > details (copie

Re: ITP: kernel-patch-selinux

2001-09-24 Thread Eric Van Buggenhaut
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 05:36:26PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux. > > Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below license > details (copied from the web site) is that the kernel patch is under the GPL

ITP: kernel-patch-selinux

2001-09-22 Thread Russell Coker
I intend to package the kernel patch for NSA Security Enhanced Linux. Below is all the details on licenses. My interpretation of the below license details (copied from the web site) is that the kernel patch is under the GPL and everything is fine. However is the issue about "warranty exclusion