On Tue, 6 Aug 1996, Emilio Lopes wrote:
> > "CS" == Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> CS> I'd like to see a bourne-like shell with perl-like regexp stuff
> CS> (mainly sed & grep) built in - i'd switch to that in a flash.
>
> People may say it's called ksh93. IMHO, it may seem so
> "CS" == Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
CS> I'd like to see a bourne-like shell with perl-like regexp stuff
CS> (mainly sed & grep) built in - i'd switch to that in a flash.
People may say it's called ksh93. IMHO, it may seem somewhat
interesting, but I really don't like it. Look l
On 3 Aug 1996, Rob Browning wrote:
> Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > what i will never understand, though, is why people use perl for
> > jobs that sh is much better suited to.
> >
> > perl is great if you want awk/sed/grep/kitchen sink all rolled into
> > one scripting language.
On Fri, 26 Jul 1996, Behan Webster wrote:
> I've also written the following simple script for one of the machines
> I manage that is used as a multi-homed web site (it has about 6 ip
> addresses right now.) Just give it a list of ip addresses on the
> command line. It's to be used once at boot t
4 matches
Mail list logo
