Thibaut Paumard writes:
> Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
>> like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
>>
>> !!!HURAY!!!
>>
>> The problem now is the transition:
>>
>> 1) multiarch a
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 04:32 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
[..]
> > Since dpkg will prefer to install packages from the native
> > architecture, I don't see any problem here. I suppose I'm biased by
> > having actually tested this.
> >
> > Ben.
>
> But it is only a pr
Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Ben Hutchings writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> >> Bastian Blank writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wr
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Ben Hutchings writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Bastian Blank writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> >> >>
Adam Borowski writes:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:33:45PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> If there is no 64bit kernel in i386 then you can not safely enable
>> multiarch to install amd64 packages (in general, kernel my just
>> work). It is kind of a prerequisite.
>
> qemu-user?
>
> Of cour
Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Bastian Blank writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>> >> just
>> >> to have a suiteable kern
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:33:45PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> If there is no 64bit kernel in i386 then you can not safely enable
> multiarch to install amd64 packages (in general, kernel my just
> work). It is kind of a prerequisite.
qemu-user?
Of course, this particular combination is
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 17:33 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bastian Blank writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> >> just
> >> to have a suiteable kernel would be quite a burden.
> >
Bastian Blank writes:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>> just
>> to have a suiteable kernel would be quite a burden.
>
> The -amd64 kernel in i386 arch is some sort of upgrade tool. With
> mult
"Bernhard R. Link" writes:
> * Ben Hutchings [120209 20:45]:
>> There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
>> definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
>> metapackages to help with this already, but we still need users to add
>> amd64 as a foreign ar
* Bastian Blank [120210 14:47]:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > Needing multi-arch enabled (with all the dangers of getting the
> > wrong packages installed
>
> Multi-arch enabled apt makes it hard to install the wrong ones. Also
> they are not wrong,
* Ben Hutchings [120210 14:45]:
> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 13:00 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> > * Ben Hutchings [120209 20:45]:
> > > There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
> > > definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
> > > metapackages to hel
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 01:00:50PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> From a user's point of view I'd really appreciate if that package could be
> kept.
It is a burden for the archive and other infrastructure.
> Needing multi-arch enabled (with all the dangers of getting the
> wrong packages
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 13:00 +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Ben Hutchings [120209 20:45]:
> > There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
> > definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
> > metapackages to help with this already, but we still need user
* Ben Hutchings [120209 20:45]:
> There is a similar issue with linux-image-*-amd64, which I would
> definitely like to remove from i386 as soon as possible. We have
> metapackages to help with this already, but we still need users to add
> amd64 as a foreign architecture before upgrading.
>From
Dear ftp-master,
I wonder if the solution below for transitioning ia32-libs to multiarch
would be OK in regards to DAK and testing transition etc. Any technical
problems why we couldn't make an exception for the 3 ia32-libs* packages
for this?
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 0
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:52:55AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:43:04PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> > Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
>
> > > now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
> > > like we can finaly get rid of
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:43:04PM +0100, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> > now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
> > like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
> > !!!HURAY!!!
> > The problem now is the transi
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 15:53:35 +0100, a écrit :
>> 3) What about stable users?
>>
>> I don't see a way to transition stable users slowly. As said above I
>> intent to request removal of ia32-libs for wheezy. So there will be no
>> transition period wh
Le 09/02/12 15:53, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
> like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
>
> !!!HURAY!!!
>
> The problem now is the transition:
>
> 1) multiarch and ia32-libs are incompatible
>[...]
>
Goswin von Brederlow (09/02/2012):
> now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
> like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
>
> !!!HURAY!!!
>
> The problem now is the transition:
0) make sure all packages are multiarchified.
To check that, I debcheckout'd i
Goswin von Brederlow, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 15:53:35 +0100, a écrit :
> 3) What about stable users?
>
> I don't see a way to transition stable users slowly. As said above I
> intent to request removal of ia32-libs for wheezy. So there will be no
> transition period where both ia32-libs and multiarch
Hi,
now that a multiarch dpkg has been uploaded to experimental it looks
like we can finaly get rid of ia32-libs* for wheezy.
!!!HURAY!!!
The problem now is the transition:
1) multiarch and ia32-libs are incompatible
Having multiarch packages and ia32-libs installed will lead to some
confusion
23 matches
Mail list logo
