dpkg --status includes the Origin: header for those packages that
specify it; reportbug already uses this to decide what BTS to use, but
it could also be included in the report.
Chri
On 2/23/06, Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to find a way of identifying the name of an installed
> distrobution. This mechanism should be able to differentiate
>
> woody
> sarge
> etch
> sid
> hoary
> breezy
> dapper
>
> Prior to etch I was using lsb-release but it seems /etc/lsb
Carlos C Soto wrote:
> Does ubuntu has a /etc/ubuntu_version ?
yes, it reads 'testing/unstable' for all past releases.
Greetings,
Reinhard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen Birch wrote:
Hi
I need to find a way of identifying the name of an installed
distrobution. This mechanism should be able to differentiate
woody
sarge
etch
sid
hoary
breezy
dapper
How about to check/grep/process /etc/debian_version installed by base-files?
$ cat /etc/debian_version
tes
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> I need to find a way of identifying the name of an installed
>> distrobution. This mechanism should be able to differentiate
>>
>> woody
>> sarge
>> etch
>> sid
>> hoary
>> breezy
>> dapper
>
> Even worse is when people mix up those releases and even
> distributions.
Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> I need to find a way of identifying the name of an installed
> distrobution. This mechanism should be able to differentiate
>
> woody
> sarge
> etch
> sid
> hoary
> breezy
> dapper
Even worse is when people mix up those releases and even
distribu
Am Donnerstag, 23. Februar 2006 10:16 schrieb Stephen Birch:
> Miles Bader([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2006-02-23 17:41:
> > Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I need to find a way of identifying the name of an installed
> > > distrobution. This mechanism should be able to differentiate
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 12:34:00AM -0800, Stephen Birch wrote:
> I don't pretend to understand the reason for this change but I do know
> that my identification mechanism is now broken on etch.
>
> Can anyone suggest a more reliable mechanism?
I think that the most reliable will be checking libc
Miles Bader([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2006-02-23 17:41:
> Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I need to find a way of identifying the name of an installed
> > distrobution. This mechanism should be able to differentiate
>
> To what end? Many people do not run "pure" releases, so the concept of
Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need to find a way of identifying the name of an installed
> distrobution. This mechanism should be able to differentiate
To what end? Many people do not run "pure" releases, so the concept of
a distro version is rather shaky at best (especially in de
Hi
I need to find a way of identifying the name of an installed
distrobution. This mechanism should be able to differentiate
woody
sarge
etch
sid
hoary
breezy
dapper
Prior to etch I was using lsb-release but it seems /etc/lsb-release is
no longer installed by 'apt-get install lsb-release'. The R
11 matches
Mail list logo