Fabrizio Polacco writes:
> Yann Dirson wrote:
> > Problem: it's really a mmap image (thus works only for executables,
> > not libs), and includes the libs symbols:
> >
>
> But the real problem is that the sizes are ... unmanageable
> the shared lib is half the size of the static one, while
Yann Dirson wrote:
>
> Correction: it works now (probably a compilation option that wasn't
> used at the time).
>
> Problem: it's really a mmap image (thus works only for executables,
> not libs), and includes the libs symbols:
>
aha, but shared libs are executable files, so I succeeded buildin
Fabrizio Polacco writes:
> Hi folks!
>
> I remember someone suggesting to tetach debugging symbols from libraries
> to package them separately on a -dbg binary package.
I think the -dbg package contain the unstripped libs, and not only the
symbols.
There would be a way of separately providin
Hi folks!
I remember someone suggesting to tetach debugging symbols from libraries
to package them separately on a -dbg binary package.
* What is the way to do that?
* How can a detached symbol table be used to debug a program?
* Can such table be used both for shared and static libs or should I
4 matches
Mail list logo
