Re: How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours

2025-05-09 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Thursday, May 8, 2025 11:31:41 PM Mountain Standard Time Paul Gevers wrote: > An alternative that can be done now: the timeout of 2:47h is per test > stanza in d/t/control (see autopkgtest(1). For some test suites it's not > hard to split the test suite over multiple stanza. The overal timeout

Re: How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours

2025-05-08 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 09-05-2025 03:28, Soren Stoutner wrote: On Thursday, May 8, 2025 4:41:16 PM Mountain Standard Time Antonio Terceiro wrote: We could allow longer timeouts on a per-package basis and on maintainer request, like we handle having packages tested with KVM instead of containers. This would ne

Re: How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours

2025-05-08 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Thursday, May 8, 2025 4:41:16 PM Mountain Standard Time Antonio Terceiro wrote: > We could allow longer timeouts on a per-package basis and on maintainer > request, like we handle having packages tested with KVM instead of > containers. > > This would need the code to actually support this to

Re: How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours

2025-05-08 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 11:38:35AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > I have two questions. > > 1. Is there a way to override the 3 hour time limit for Debian CI for a > particular package? No. > 2. Would there be objections to reconsidering the 3 hour default time limit > for all packages? We

How should Debian CI handle autopkgtests that require more than three hours

2025-05-08 Thread Soren Stoutner
Every once in a while there is a package that requires more than three hours to run autopkgtest. One example is pyinstaller-hooks-contrib. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pyinstaller-hooks-contrib On amd64, armhf, and i386, the tests currently take slightly less than 3 hours. But on arm64, the