Re: Heimdal Bugs re update-alternatives

2025-02-15 Thread Brian May
Gabor Gombas writes: > This one is nothing special - some commands behaving differently based > on argv[0] is a traditional Unix thing. "(exec -a klist klist.heimdal)" > should work. Sorry, not 100% sure what you are trying to say here. Are you suggesting that https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Re: Heimdal Bugs re update-alternatives

2025-02-15 Thread Brian May
Gabor Gombas writes: > Exactly - that's why making the KDC package Conflicts: with the other > implementation would be a quick fix. There aren't many KDC > implementations, and I think Shishi does not use kadmin (I'm not sure, I > never used it), so maintaining such Conflicts: does not sound like

Re: Heimdal Bugs re update-alternatives

2025-02-11 Thread Gabor Gombas
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 09:59:26AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > As someone who used to have to regularly deal with multi-implementation > Kerberos setups, I can confirm that there is a real need to be able to > install the Heimdal clients and the MIT clients (including kadmin) at the > same time.

Re: Heimdal Bugs re update-alternatives

2025-02-11 Thread Vincent Danjean
Le 10/02/2025 à 18:59, Russ Allbery a écrit : It's unfortunate that the commands have the same names in both Kerberos distributions, although it's understandable from a user UI perspective. I don't have a good solution. Either using alternatives or not using alternatives runs some risk of breaki

Re: Heimdal Bugs re update-alternatives

2025-02-10 Thread Russ Allbery
Gabor Gombas writes: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 08:59:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote: >> Is it appropriate to use update-alternatives for kadmin that is supplied >> with {Heimdal,MIT} Kerberos? > ... in the real world, KDCs tend to be heavily locked down machines with > not much else installed, due

Re: Heimdal Bugs re update-alternatives

2025-02-10 Thread Gabor Gombas
Hi, On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 08:59:47AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Can I please have some thoughts on #1070031? > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070031 Hmm, how is that possible? At a quick glance, heimdal-kdc Depends: on heimdal-clients, and krb5-user Conflicts: with heimda

Heimdal Bugs re update-alternatives

2025-02-09 Thread Brian May
Hello, Can I please have some thoughts on #1070031? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070031 Is it appropriate to use update-alternatives for kadmin that is supplied with {Heimdal,MIT} Kerberos? I am thinking they do very different things but maybe not. i.e. one updates files f