On Mi, 18 iul 12, 21:32:31, Wookey wrote:
> >
> > One of the reasons I'm using network-manager instead of wicd or even
> > plain ifupdown is the possibility to switch (more or less) seamlessly
> > between wired and wifi.
>
> wicd does this just fine too.
In the past I've had problems with wic
On 2012-07-18 21:32:31 +0100, Wookey wrote:
> +++ Andrei POPESCU [2012-07-18 20:56 +0300]:
> > One of the reasons I'm using network-manager instead of wicd or even
> > plain ifupdown is the possibility to switch (more or less) seamlessly
> > between wired and wifi.
>
> wicd does this just fine t
+++ Andrei POPESCU [2012-07-18 20:56 +0300]:
> On Mi, 18 iul 12, 15:01:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >
> > A different idea would be to have NM configured by default to do what it can
> > do well (wifi) and stay away from all other interfaces, but because it has
> > thorough assumptions that it contr
On Mi, 18 iul 12, 15:01:43, Adam Borowski wrote:
>
> A different idea would be to have NM configured by default to do what it can
> do well (wifi) and stay away from all other interfaces, but because it has
> thorough assumptions that it controls all of networking in the system, this
> is not a ch
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:31:37PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Still, the check would be useful on laptops where wicd is installed
> and enabled (the user could have a default ifupdown config and wicd
> enabled).
What happens if neither wicd nor network-manager are installed, and then both
are
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:01:43PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> wicd is used only on machines that use wifi, this excludes most desktops.
wicd can also be used to "manage" different Ethernet configurations.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2012-07-18 15:01:43 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:18:12PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Sorry for being late in the discussion. I also think that having
> > NetworkManager disabled for those who do not want to use it is
> > a good solution. But I think that if othe
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:18:12PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2012-07-14 22:59:35 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > Due to those drawbacks, I've wondered why people don't just disable
> > NetworkManager on their system instead of bothering with workarounds
> > like the above or dpkg -P --fo
On 2012-07-14 22:59:35 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Due to those drawbacks, I've wondered why people don't just disable
> NetworkManager on their system instead of bothering with workarounds
> like the above or dpkg -P --force-depends and similar.
Sorry for being late in the discussion. I also
9 matches
Mail list logo
