Re: Happy new year 2003

2005-01-01 Thread David Moreno Garza
On Fri, 2004-12-31 at 23:50 +0100, Jean-Luc Picard wrote: > yes, debian is still 2 years late to any other distro. WTF do you get by trolling? -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ If you fall and break your leg, don't come running to me!

Re: Happy new year 2003

2005-01-01 Thread Gustavo Franco
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 23:50:52 +0100, Jean-Luc Picard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes, debian is still 2 years late to any other distro. If you're sleeping since Woody release, we're! Good morning Jean-Luc, for your information: - There' s a new Debian installer[0] that will be used in the upcomin

Re: Happy new year 2003

2005-01-01 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
El dv 31 de 12 del 2004 a les 23:50 +0100, en/na Jean-Luc Picard va escriure: > yes, debian is still 2 years late to any other distro. Are you sure? I win a lot of time using debian because all I can find is packaged and works directly, the quality and dependence system is enought hard to assure I

Re: Happy new year 2003

2005-01-01 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Jean-Luc Picard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > yes, debian is still 2 years late to any other distro. Flame answer sent in private mail, in French, which makes me easier to share my feelings about the consideration the above mail shows towards a volunteer work.