Re: Handing over readseq

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 18:54, Michael Schmitz wrote: > > When I'm doing such package chang-over's it's generally just arranged > > through private mail and the rest of the world learns about it through > > the changelog. > > > > IMHO an arranged take-over like that requires no special announcements.

Re: Handing over readseq

> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:07, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I just hand over the readseq package to Michael Schmitz. He is obviousely > > much more competent to maintain the package than me. We agreed not to > > go the bureocratic orphan and adopt. The next upload will just come from > > Michael. > >

Re: Handing over readseq

On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 06:32:41PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: Why so formal? We haven't met our bureaucracy quota for the month. I hope that everyone will do his part. Mike Stone

Re: Handing over readseq

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 14:07, Andreas Tille wrote: > I just hand over the readseq package to Michael Schmitz. He is obviousely > much more competent to maintain the package than me. We agreed not to > go the bureocratic orphan and adopt. The next upload will just come from > Michael. Why so formal

Re: Handing over readseq

> I just hand over the readseq package to Michael Schmitz. He is obviousely > much more competent to maintain the package than me. We agreed not to Meaning I've used it a lot, including local modifications and such. And I have a moderate interest in keeping that package around. > go the bureocr

Handing over readseq

Hi, I just hand over the readseq package to Michael Schmitz. He is obviousely much more competent to maintain the package than me. We agreed not to go the bureocratic orphan and adopt. The next upload will just come from Michael. Kind regards Andreas.