Re: Hamm CD layouts

1998-06-18 Thread Heiko Schlittermann
On Wed, Jun 17, 1998 at 09:58:58PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: : : Has any consensus been reached about the best layout to be used for Hamm : disks? I've written several 3-CD sets for people so far using a simple : layout (below), but it would be nice to be able to produce to produce ones : simil

Re: Hamm CD layouts

1998-06-18 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Philip Hands wrote: > > Disk 1: Main binary (i386, bootable) > > Disk 2: Contrib, non-free and non-US (binary-i386 and source) > > Disk 3: Main source (except X11, movesd to disk #2 for space reasons) > > I think we need two layouts, one for the mass-production folks, and

Re: Hamm CD layouts

1998-06-17 Thread Philip Hands
> Has any consensus been reached about the best layout to be used for Hamm > disks? I've written several 3-CD sets for people so far using a simple > layout (below), but it would be nice to be able to produce to produce ones > similar to the official ones... > > Disk 1: Main binary (i386, bootab

Hamm CD layouts

1998-06-17 Thread Steve McIntyre
Has any consensus been reached about the best layout to be used for Hamm disks? I've written several 3-CD sets for people so far using a simple layout (below), but it would be nice to be able to produce to produce ones similar to the official ones... Disk 1: Main binary (i386, bootable) Disk 2: