On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:57:04AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Whether doing it this way is a good idea, though, I don't know. Buildd
> > surely wasn't designed for this.
>
> It is much simpler than to set up wanna-build and a local archive
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Or just dump all packages into the buildds queue file (as
>
> That would be ~buildd/build/REDO
>
>> package_version, one per line) and start it.
>
> That would be
>
> package_vers
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 09:47:53PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Or just dump all packages into the buildds queue file (as
That would be ~buildd/build/REDO
> package_version, one per line) and start it.
That would be
package_version distribution
instead, as in
nbd_1:2.8.4-2 unstable
W
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to rebuild the whole archive on my box but I don't really know
> where to start. I don't want to keep the resulting packages, I just want
> to seek FTBFSes.
>
> I've installed sbuild (do I really need it? Does pbuilder/cowbuilder
> s
Hi all,
I want to rebuild the whole archive on my box but I don't really know
where to start. I don't want to keep the resulting packages, I just want
to seek FTBFSes.
I've installed sbuild (do I really need it? Does pbuilder/cowbuilder
suffice?) and followed the instructions of the manpage to se
5 matches
Mail list logo