On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 12:47:14PM -0800, Will Lowe wrote:
> > mozilla-browser is 30 megabytes and duplicates the vast majority of
> > firefox
>
> Is 30M of disk space really that precious these days? I can't imagine
> trying to run software that uses GTKMozEmbed on an embedded device
> where sp
> mozilla-browser is 30 megabytes and duplicates the vast majority of
> firefox
Is 30M of disk space really that precious these days? I can't imagine
trying to run software that uses GTKMozEmbed on an embedded device
where space is truly at a premium.
And splitting hairs like this is partially
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 10:01:10PM -0500, William Ballard wrote:
> Why should I install an email client and web page editor,
> the bloat that is Mozilla, just to get GtkMozEmbed?
Not to include you in this group, instead it would appear that you actually
have a clue, but most of the clueless horde
Eric Dorland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> [...] Firefox now tends to fork from the mainline mozilla tree, so the
> code can be quite different, or at least different enough to make
> having firefox load the mozilla components quite impossible.
FWIW, I was also under the impression that the official
* William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:08:03PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > * William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:44:05AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > > mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser, but not mozilla.
>
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 12:08:03PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:44:05AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > > mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser, but not mozilla.
> >
> > mozilla-browser is 30 megabytes and duplicates
* William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:44:05AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> > mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser, but not mozilla.
>
> mozilla-browser is 30 megabytes and duplicates the vast majority of
> firefox
So every program that uses MozEmbed ne
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 08:44:05AM +0100, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser, but not mozilla.
mozilla-browser is 30 megabytes and duplicates the vast majority of
firefox
as my link suggest apparently there exists an rpm for
gtkmozembed-firefox so somebody else a
* William Ballard wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:55:42PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > And what would the advantage be over using mozilla? The gecko
> > engine is the same, in fact mozilla tends to have a newer gecko
> > engine than firefox. I mean this could be done, but if it doesn't
> > ac
* William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:55:42PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > And what would the advantage be over using mozilla? The gecko engine
> > is the same, in fact mozilla tends to have a newer gecko engine than
> > firefox. I mean this could be done, but
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:55:42PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> And what would the advantage be over using mozilla? The gecko engine
> is the same, in fact mozilla tends to have a newer gecko engine than
> firefox. I mean this could be done, but if it doesn't actually confer
> any advantages why bo
* William Ballard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> gtkmozembed.h is packaged in mozilla-dev
> mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser
>
> Apparently it is possible to use FireFox instead and RPM for
> "firefox-gtkmozembed" exit:
> http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2004-October/011326
gtkmozembed.h is packaged in mozilla-dev
mozilla-dev depends on mozilla-browser
Apparently it is possible to use FireFox instead and RPM for
"firefox-gtkmozembed" exit:
http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2004-October/011326.html
Will Debian package such?
13 matches
Mail list logo
