Re: Git Service for Debian (was Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian)

2016-07-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2016, ജൂലൈ 29 9:42:44 PM IST, Balasankar C wrote: >Let's agree to disagree. I have my concerns about wastage of >time/energy/archive space etc. Having to drop an effort (yes, speaking >that >with my GitLab packager hat on) in midway and starting another with all >good >hope, without even havi

Re: Git Service for Debian (was Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian)

2016-07-29 Thread Balasankar C
On വെള്ളി 29 ജൂലൈ 2016 09:10 വൈകു, Alexandre Viau wrote: > On 29/07/16 11:36 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 20:53:48 +0530, Balasankar C wrote: >>> When did we (i.e Debian) finalize on using Pagure? I think, we should first >>> fix >>> a solution and then start working on tha

Re: Git Service for Debian (was Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian)

2016-07-29 Thread Alexandre Viau
On 29/07/16 11:36 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 20:53:48 +0530, Balasankar C wrote: >> When did we (i.e Debian) finalize on using Pagure? I think, we should first >> fix >> a solution and then start working on that. Or, we would be going the same way >> as of GitLab. >> > Tha

Re: Git Service for Debian (was Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian)

2016-07-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 20:53:48 +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > On വ്യാഴം 28 ജൂലൈ 2016 12:10 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving to less > > controversial alternative pagure. > > When did we (i.e Debian) finalize on us

Git Service for Debian (was Re: Next steps for gitlab.debian)

2016-07-29 Thread Balasankar C
On വ്യാഴം 28 ജൂലൈ 2016 12:10 വൈകു, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hi all, > > At this point, I'm dropping work on gitlab for debian and moving to less > controversial alternative pagure. When did we (i.e Debian) finalize on using Pagure? I think, we should first fix a solution and then start working on