Re: Getting resolvconf back into testing

2008-06-25 Thread Thomas Hood
Peter Samuelson wrote: > Looks like you just need to wait 4 more days. Lenny isn't frozen yet, > not for optional packages. OK, thanks. (I was under the impression that some sort of intervention was required in order to undo a removal.) -- Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Getting resolvconf back into testing

2008-06-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:58:11PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > > On 15 June the resolvconf package was removed from testing due to an RC bug. > > > A fixed version of the package has been uploaded and is now in unstable. > > > I would like to request t

Re: Getting resolvconf back into testing

2008-06-24 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 05:58:11PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > On 15 June the resolvconf package was removed from testing due to an RC bug. > A fixed version of the package has been uploaded and is now in unstable. > I would like to request that the resolvconf package be re-admitted to testing. >

Re: Getting resolvconf back into testing

2008-06-24 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Thomas Hood] > I would like to request that the resolvconf package be re-admitted to > testing. $ grep-excuses resolvconf resolvconf (- to 1.41) Maintainer: resolvconf maintainers Too young, only 6 of 10 days old Ignoring high urgency setting for NEW package

Getting resolvconf back into testing

2008-06-24 Thread Thomas Hood
On 15 June the resolvconf package was removed from testing due to an RC bug. A fixed version of the package has been uploaded and is now in unstable. I would like to request that the resolvconf package be re-admitted to testing. Unfortunately I haven't received any responses to this request from