On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> Joey Hess has done some work to allow debhelper to handle the case of files
> >> under debian/ that should be ignored (sinc
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> Joey Hess has done some work to allow debhelper to handle the case of files
>> under debian/ that should be ignored (since they can't be deleted as part of
>> a diff); I'm afr
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:05 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:00:17AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> >
> > > It is okay to have the debian directory in your tarball but, if you go
> > > down
> > > this road, it will be des
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Joey Hess has done some work to allow debhelper to handle the case of files
> under debian/ that should be ignored (since they can't be deleted as part of
> a diff); I'm afraid I don't know the current state of this work and haven't
> heard of it being m
Steve Langasek wrote:
>> It is okay to have the debian directory in your tarball but, if you go down
>> this road, it will be desirable that the Debian maintainer/sponsor for your
>> package has commit access to the SVN repository.
>
> Even if this is the case, it is still annoying for NMUers to
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:05 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:00:17AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > It is okay to have the debian directory in your tarball but, if you go down
> > this road, it will be desirable that the Debian maintainer/sponsor for your
> > packa
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:19:54 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Well I was told that this is also a bad idea, and a maintainer should
> not include those debian specific file directly in the upstream
> source.
> [Aim]
> So my question is: is this correct ?
> [Fire]
> If
On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 02:00:17AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> It is okay to have the debian directory in your tarball but, if you go down
> this road, it will be desirable that the Debian maintainer/sponsor for your
> package has commit access to the SVN repository.
Even if this is the ca
* Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-24 23:19]:
> In take 3, I implemented entirely by hand all the proper debian files,
> as can be found here:
>
> http://gdcm.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/gdcm/trunk/debian/
>
> [Ready]
>
> Well I was told that this is also a bad idea, and a main
Hello there, long time !
[Take 2 of 'Generating debian package using cmake' has been rated
PJ-13-crude language, so let's try to make a clean sequel]
In take 1, I was generating debian using cmake internal implementation
of debian package, which as most of you know, was doomed to failure
In tak
10 matches
Mail list logo
