Re: GOB

2000-03-26 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:12:26AM +1000, Robert Graham Merkel wrote: > There has been some discussion about packaging GOB on the lists. > If they are OK and a developer is prepared to sponsor me I'd love > to have the packages added to the distribution. I already uploaded a packa

Re: GOB

2000-03-26 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:12:26AM +1000, Robert Graham Merkel écrivait: > There has been some discussion about packaging GOB on the lists. > > I have made some test packages which should be available from: > > http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~rgmerk/software > > If they are

GOB

2000-03-26 Thread Robert Graham Merkel
There has been some discussion about packaging GOB on the lists. I have made some test packages which should be available from: http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~rgmerk/software If they are OK and a developer is prepared to sponsor me I'd love to have the packages added to the distrib

Re: ITP: GOB [Was: Re: GOB package?]

2000-03-23 Thread Ian McKellar
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 07:11:07PM +, Jules Bean wrote: > > This would be mildy convenient for me, since the next major release of > balsa may require, or simply prefer, GOB, to build. And gnome-pilot seems to require GOB now... > > [*sigh* why not just blasted use C++] *cough* Ian

Re: ITP: GOB [Was: Re: GOB package?]

2000-03-21 Thread Jules Bean
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 04:26:37PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 09:38:50AM -0500, Peter Teichman wrote: > > > A quick search through debian-devel and wnpp yields no ITP for > > Indeed. I'd been wondering if it were packaged under an unusual name or

ITP: GOB [Was: Re: GOB package?]

2000-03-21 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 09:38:50AM -0500, Peter Teichman wrote: > A quick search through debian-devel and wnpp yields no ITP for Indeed. I'd been wondering if it were packaged under an unusual name or something. > gob.. Maybe someone would like to pick it up? I'll do it mysel