Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 06:24:50PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
>> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:06 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>> > The resolution which passed excludes documentation with front cover
>> > texts. Read it.
>>
>> I re-read it, and it
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 06:24:50PM +0100, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:06 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > The resolution which passed excludes documentation with front cover
> > texts. Read it.
>
> I re-read it, and it states:
> | This means that works that don't include
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 14:06 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok, there are no invariant sections, but there is (a short) front and
> > back cover text.
> >
> > How do we proceed with these documents?
>
> The resolution which passed excludes do
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, there are no invariant sections, but there is (a short) front and
> back cover text.
>
> How do we proceed with these documents?
The resolution which passed excludes documentation with front cover
texts. Read it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
El miércoles, 15 de marzo de 2006 a las 00:14:07 +0100, Henning Makholm
escribía:
> The above sentence from Jacobo Tarrio seems to use "not distributable"
> in sense (b). Since this is not in fact -legal, I assume that we all
> actually agree and that JT is simply unfamiliar with the relevant
> j
Scripsit [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew M.A. Cater)
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:30:04AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > So it is still not distributable.
>> ... in main.
> The Debian distribution _is_ main (and only main).
The jargon in debian-legal trad
Norbert Preining wrote:
> Dear all!
>
> Now that the GFDL resolution has been done, I have the following
> question:
>
> Most (some) documents of the FSF have the following license for the
> docs:
> Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
> under the terms of th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew M.A. Cater) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:30:04AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > El martes, 14 de marzo de 2006 a las 08:27:25 +0100, Norbert Preining
>> > escribía:
>> >
>> >> Ok, there are no invariant sections, bu
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:30:04AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > El martes, 14 de marzo de 2006 a las 08:27:25 +0100, Norbert Preining
> > escribía:
> >
> >> Ok, there are no invariant sections, but there is (a short) front and
> >> back cover text.
>
Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El martes, 14 de marzo de 2006 a las 08:27:25 +0100, Norbert Preining
> escribía:
>
>> Ok, there are no invariant sections, but there is (a short) front and
>> back cover text.
>> How do we proceed with these documents?
>
> From the text of the GR itsel
El martes, 14 de marzo de 2006 a las 08:27:25 +0100, Norbert Preining escribía:
> Ok, there are no invariant sections, but there is (a short) front and
> back cover text.
> How do we proceed with these documents?
From the text of the GR itself:
This means that works that don't include any Invar
Dear all!
Now that the GFDL resolution has been done, I have the following
question:
Most (some) documents of the FSF have the following license for the
docs:
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1
12 matches
Mail list logo