Le Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 06:07:19PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>
> I deliberately used an extremely few insulting word for this
> but I don’t know how to else express it. And I do not believe
> in staying quiet if it can’t be politely expressed, because,
> let’s face it, the real world *is* f
Hi,
Adam Borowski:
> > The only acceptable concrete value for 'extremely few' is Zero.
>
> I'd say losing patience is quite understandable in this case
Probably. However, the context of this thread was not at all about a
maintainer who refused to apply a perfectly sensible patch. Getting
confron
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:41:30PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Thorsten Glaser:
> > I deliberately used an extremely few insulting word for this
>
> You should have deliberated a bit more, then.
>
> The only acceptable concrete value for 'extremely few' is Zero.
I'd say losing patience is q
Hi,
Thorsten Glaser:
> I deliberately used an extremely few insulting word for this
You should have deliberated a bit more, then.
The only acceptable concrete value for 'extremely few' is Zero.
--
-- Matthias Urlichs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
Forwarding a bit of my answer on this. I don’t know what to
think about how this criticism immediately raises responses
like the two I already got, yet the other person in question
is allowed to disrespect his fellow DDs and just ignore the
fixes for real-world, although minority, problems.
I deli
5 matches
Mail list logo
