On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:50, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:52:36PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> > I *guess* that Debian has a much higher percentage of downloads through
> > mirrors where we don't have the log files compared to FC, so this
> > obviously doesn't
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 11:52:36PM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
>
> I *guess* that Debian has a much higher percentage of downloads through
> mirrors where we don't have the log files compared to FC, so this obviously
> doesn't change that we won't be able to come even close to a reasonable
On Sunday 19 November 2006 01:35, Michelle Konzack wrote:
[FC core download stats]
> Blahblah!
...
> So the download statistics would be false anyway.
It's not necessary to be so arrogant. In their email, they acknowledge that
proxies etc. have influenced their stats. Their numbers are a lower b
Am 2006-11-17 07:06:33, schrieb Tshepang Lekhonkhobe:
> A few minutes ago, we crossed over the 300,000 mark.
>
> That's 300,000 different IP addresses that have checked for any updated
> software in Fedora Core 6.
In 24 days!
If an ISP assign your ADSL account with an IP which expires
all 24 hou
Hi Wouter and *,
Am 2006-11-17 14:06:17, schrieb Wouter Verhelst:
> However, etch will install popcon by default, which also tracks unique
Hey cool.
> submitters. While this will be voluntary (people can decline to install
> popcon fairly easily), it will give us a fair approximation of the
> n
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 11:28:18AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 02:06:17PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:06:33AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Could we have something like this after release:
> > [...tracking unique I
On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 07:06:33 +0200, "Tshepang Lekhonkhobe"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That's 300,000 different IP addresses that have checked for any updated
>software in Fedora Core 6.
>
>If you simply divide it out, that averages to about 12,500 per day, or 8.7
>every minute. And basically, tho
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 02:06:17PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:06:33AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Could we have something like this after release:
> [...tracking unique IP addresses that connect to Fedora mirrors...]
>
> Doing it that way (checkin
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:06:33AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Could we have something like this after release:
> [...tracking unique IP addresses that connect to Fedora mirrors...]
>
> Doing it that way (checking for people running 'apt-get update' or
> s
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 07:06:33AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> Hi,
> Could we have something like this after release:
[...tracking unique IP addresses that connect to Fedora mirrors...]
Doing it that way (checking for people running 'apt-get update' or
similar) isn't going to be possible
Hi,
Could we have something like this after release:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Max Spevack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Nov 16, 2006 11:39 PM
Subject: FC6 downloads and installs
To: fedora-announce-list@redhat.com
Pardon the widest possible distribution, but I hope that people
11 matches
Mail list logo