On 29/09/2006 Jon Dowland wrote:
> Jonas Meurer wrote:
> >I don't use any acceleration at all. I run the mga matrox Xserver, which
> >doesn't support any kind of 3d acceleration. (my graphics controller is
> >a Matrox MGA G400)
>
> At this point it would be useful to see your Xorg.conf (but not to
On 29/09/2006 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 28/09/2006 Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >> --- Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> [...]
> >> Are you using some kind of OpenGL acceleration? It seems that CPU gets too
> >> loaded if not, upstream is working in
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28/09/2006 Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>> --- Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
[...]
>> Are you using some kind of OpenGL acceleration? It seems that CPU gets too
>> loaded if not, upstream is working in that.
> I don't use any acceleration at all. I
Jonas Meurer wrote:
I don't use any acceleration at all. I run the mga matrox Xserver, which
doesn't support any kind of 3d acceleration. (my graphics controller is
a Matrox MGA G400)
At this point it would be useful to see your Xorg.conf (but not to the
list, perhaps better to the bug)
Your
On 28/09/2006 Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
> --- Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> > it seems like gnash puts heavy load on my system, if a flash animation
> > at www.myspace.com is started. and as i was not able to reproduce the
> > Xserver crash later, i believe that it was related to oth
On Sep 28, Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In my experience, it will even _require_ AMD64 or similar CPUs to
> > display even trivial pages.
> Isn't that a given for anything even remotely related to flash?
Not at all.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> it seems like gnash puts heavy load on my system, if a flash animation
> at www.myspace.com is started. and as i was not able to reproduce the
> Xserver crash later, i believe that it was related to other heavy
> applications running the first tim
On 28/09/2006 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Miriam Ruiz]
> > Jonas has already filed some bugs against gnash. To be honest, I
> > don't know the reason for your words, and if there's some kind of
> > irony behind them.
>
> There might of course be a bug in gnash related to the X crash, but if
>
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:38:51AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> [on gnash]
> > In my experience, it will even _require_ AMD64 or similar CPUs to
> > display even trivial pages.
>
> Isn't that a given for anything even remotely related to flash?
Exactly, it is not like the
[Miriam Ruiz]
> Jonas has already filed some bugs against gnash. To be honest, I
> don't know the reason for your words, and if there's some kind of
> irony behind them.
There might of course be a bug in gnash related to the X crash, but if
a user space program is able to crash the X server, ther
On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 04:38:51AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
[on gnash]
> In my experience, it will even _require_ AMD64 or similar CPUs to
> display even trivial pages.
Isn't that a given for anything even remotely related to flash?
--
Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-de
--- Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> When you do, the 'reportbug' tool (which you can install via aptitude
> if you don't already have it) will make it easy to report a bug to the
> Debian bug tracking system.
Jonas has already filed some bugs against gnash. To be honest, I don't know
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 28/09/2006 Ben Finney wrote:
> > Excellent. You're getting more of an understanding of how to
> > reproduce this bug in your X server. I hope that soon you can
> > submit a bug report against the X server with a test case.
>
> i'm not able to reproduc
On 28/09/2006 Ben Finney wrote:
> Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 26/09/2006 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > > That would be a bug in your X server. X servers should not crash
> > > no matter the client. :)
> >
> > ... my X server crashed a second time, this time at an artist at
Jonas Meurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 26/09/2006 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > That would be a bug in your X server. X servers should not crash
> > no matter the client. :)
>
> ... my X server crashed a second time, this time at an artist at
> myspace.com, which automaticly starts a fla
On 26/09/2006 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Jonas Meurer]
> > unfortunately mozilla-plugin-gnash crashes for most flash pages.
>
> OK. If you got time, please add these test pages to the wiki. I have
> not been able to get the latest plugin to crash, so I am interested in
> these pages.
i must
Petter Reinholdtsen dijo [Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 06:21:24PM +0200]:
>
> [Gunnar Wolf]
> > In my experience, it will even _require_ AMD64 or similar CPUs to
> > display even trivial pages. Gnash is still a long way for being
> > useful on most machines - it's just too heavy.
>
> OK. Do you have URL
[Jonas Meurer]
> unfortunately mozilla-plugin-gnash crashes for most flash pages.
OK. If you got time, please add these test pages to the wiki. I have
not been able to get the latest plugin to crash, so I am interested in
these pages.
> www.sonnenvakuum.ch even killed my Xserver once.
That wou
On 26/09/2006 Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> [Tollef Fog Heen]
> > Not having flash is a good, not a bad thing to me at least. :-)
>
> Now you can have flash support for your browser in unstable, at least,
> by installing the mozilla-plugin-gnash or konqueror-plugin-gnash
> package. The gnash pa
[Gunnar Wolf]
> In my experience, it will even _require_ AMD64 or similar CPUs to
> display even trivial pages. Gnash is still a long way for being
> useful on most machines - it's just too heavy.
OK. Do you have URLs to test pages showing this behaviour? I use the
test ages listed in
http://wi
Petter Reinholdtsen dijo [Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 01:10:55PM +0200]:
>
> [Tollef Fog Heen]
> > Not having flash is a good, not a bad thing to me at least. :-)
>
> Now you can have flash support for your browser in unstable, at least,
> by installing the mozilla-plugin-gnash or konqueror-plugin-gnash
[Tollef Fog Heen]
> Not having flash is a good, not a bad thing to me at least. :-)
Now you can have flash support for your browser in unstable, at least,
by installing the mozilla-plugin-gnash or konqueror-plugin-gnash
package. The gnash package is already capable of running quite a few
flash p
22 matches
Mail list logo
