On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:48:35AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 06:35:23PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:56:11PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > For now I suggest you contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 06:35:23PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:56:11PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > For now I suggest you contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > OK, thanks; I considered that, but wasn't sure it was focused enou
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:56:11PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For now I suggest you contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> OK, thanks; I considered that, but wasn't sure it was focused enough.
> (Granted, -devel isn't that focused either, but it is more
> deve
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've requested the binNMU to be done, it should probably get
> build tomorrow somewhere.
Thanks.
> For now I suggest you contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, thanks; I considered that, but wasn't sure it was focused enough.
(Granted, -devel isn't that focused
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 04:25:43PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Yee-ha! This makes a wonderful (if moderately belated) first birthday
> present for my em64t workstation. :-)
>
> One question, though: what's the contact address for the new buildd's
> administrators? I tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] (to
Yee-ha! This makes a wonderful (if moderately belated) first birthday
present for my em64t workstation. :-)
One question, though: what's the contact address for the new buildd's
administrators? I tried [EMAIL PROTECTED] (to call #359023 to their
attention), but it bounces.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB
* Goswin von Brederlow:
>>> Anything that runs from current amd64.debian.net or its mirrors.
>>
>> Both debian-amd64 and debian-pure64? Great, thanks.
>
> They are just aliases for the same thing since always.
Oh, this wasn't clear from the FAQ. Fortunately, all this is now OBE.
--
To UNSUBS
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>
>>> It would also be interesting to know which AMD64 architecture variants
>>> permit seamless upgrades to the official AMD64 version.
>>
>> Anything that runs from current amd64.debian.net or its mirrors.
>
> Both debian-amd64
* Goswin von Brederlow:
>> It would also be interesting to know which AMD64 architecture variants
>> permit seamless upgrades to the official AMD64 version.
>
> Anything that runs from current amd64.debian.net or its mirrors.
Both debian-amd64 and debian-pure64? Great, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin von Brederlow:
>
>> Can you remeber to close this bug when maintainer uploads for amd64
>> get enabled?
>
> It would also be interesting to know which AMD64 architecture variants
> permit seamless upgrades to the official AMD64 version.
Anythi
* Goswin von Brederlow:
> Can you remeber to close this bug when maintainer uploads for amd64
> get enabled?
It would also be interesting to know which AMD64 architecture variants
permit seamless upgrades to the official AMD64 version.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
Anthony Towns writes:
> Hi all,
>
> binutils | 2.16.1cvs20060117-1 | unstable | source, alpha, amd64, [...]
>
> Over the next couple of days, the rest of build-essential will be rebuilt,
> followed by the rest of the archive. You should be able to watch the
> progress somewhat via:
>
> h
12 matches
Mail list logo
