Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Anyway I think it can be unlikely to remove empty files when they are
> linked from others files. E.g. a .html having a link to another empty
> .html. In such a case having the empty html file is better than having
> no html at all to avoid future browser complains.
I t
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:07:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> This strikes me as a good idea, unless someone has a legit reason to
> include an empty documentations file in a package. So speak up if you
> do. Maybe a zero length TODO could be considered to have some implied
> meaning, but I've seen
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 09:13:06AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:07:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > This strikes me as a good idea, unless someone has a legit reason to
> > include an empty documentations file in a package. So speak up if you
> > do. Maybe a zero length
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:07:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> This strikes me as a good idea, unless someone has a legit reason to
> include an empty documentations file in a package. So speak up if you
> do. Maybe a zero length TODO could be considered to have some implied
> meaning,
in my mind, i
This strikes me as a good idea, unless someone has a legit reason to
include an empty documentations file in a package. So speak up if you
do. Maybe a zero length TODO could be considered to have some implied
meaning, but I've seen zero length everything including AUTHORS and
README and NEWS.
5 matches
Mail list logo
