Re: FVWM 2.5.x debs

2003-04-29 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:57:54 +0200 > "Md" == Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Md> Md> On Apr 29, Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Actually, I would like to close #189664 without uploading any fvwm2.5 >> packages to unstable, if no one objects. Md> I object, as t

Re: FVWM 2.5.x debs

2003-04-29 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Apr 29, Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Actually, I would like to close #189664 without uploading any fvwm2.5 >packages to unstable, if no one objects. I object, as the problem (fvwm not working with gnome2) still exists. The open bug will help other users to find the soluti

Re: FVWM 2.5.x debs

2003-04-29 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:11:58 +0200 > "HD" == Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: HD> HD> Hi Alex, HD> Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: >> Hello. >> Recently I was reported [1] by Marco d'Itri that FVWM from stable >> branch (2.4.x) does not work with GNOME2, so he requested 2.5.x >> pack

Re: FVWM 2.5.x debs

2003-04-29 Thread Harald Dunkel
Hi Alex, Alexander Kotelnikov wrote: Hello. Recently I was reported [1] by Marco d'Itri that FVWM from stable branch (2.4.x) does not work with GNOME2, so he requested 2.5.x packages from me. Olivier Chapuis clarified the situation in his reply [2] to my question in fvwm-workers mailing list. FVWM

FVWM 2.5.x debs

2003-04-28 Thread Alexander Kotelnikov
Hello. Recently I was reported [1] by Marco d'Itri that FVWM from stable branch (2.4.x) does not work with GNOME2, so he requested 2.5.x packages from me. Olivier Chapuis clarified the situation in his reply [2] to my question in fvwm-workers mailing list. FVWM packages are ready and apt'able no