> On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:57:54 +0200
> "Md" == Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Md>
Md> On Apr 29, Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Actually, I would like to close #189664 without uploading any fvwm2.5
>> packages to unstable, if no one objects.
Md> I object, as t
On Apr 29, Alexander Kotelnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Actually, I would like to close #189664 without uploading any fvwm2.5
>packages to unstable, if no one objects.
I object, as the problem (fvwm not working with gnome2) still exists.
The open bug will help other users to find the soluti
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:11:58 +0200
> "HD" == Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HD>
HD> Hi Alex,
HD> Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
>> Hello.
>> Recently I was reported [1] by Marco d'Itri that FVWM from stable
>> branch (2.4.x) does not work with GNOME2, so he requested 2.5.x
>> pack
Hi Alex,
Alexander Kotelnikov wrote:
Hello.
Recently I was reported [1] by Marco d'Itri that FVWM from stable
branch (2.4.x) does not work with GNOME2, so he requested 2.5.x
packages from me.
Olivier Chapuis clarified the situation in his reply [2] to my
question in fvwm-workers mailing list.
FVWM
Hello.
Recently I was reported [1] by Marco d'Itri that FVWM from stable
branch (2.4.x) does not work with GNOME2, so he requested 2.5.x
packages from me.
Olivier Chapuis clarified the situation in his reply [2] to my
question in fvwm-workers mailing list.
FVWM packages are ready and apt'able no
5 matches
Mail list logo