Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi
>
> If this is the case, then I think lintian should be updated to tell
> people this. It is in fact lintian that have made me do this kind
> of change for all the Arch: all packages that I maintain.
>
> Please CC me as I'm not on this list anymore i
Hi
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:50:28PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Le mer 5 juillet 2006 23:28, Ola Lundqvist a écrit :
> > Hi
> >
> > If this is the case, then I think lintian should be updated to tell
> > people this. It is in fact lintian that have made me do this kind
> > of change for all
Hi
If this is the case, then I think lintian should be updated to tell
people this. It is in fact lintian that have made me do this kind
of change for all the Arch: all packages that I maintain.
Please CC me as I'm not on this list anymore if you have comments
on my post.
Regards,
// Ola
On T
Le mer 5 juillet 2006 23:28, Ola Lundqvist a écrit :
> Hi
>
> If this is the case, then I think lintian should be updated to tell
> people this. It is in fact lintian that have made me do this kind
> of change for all the Arch: all packages that I maintain.
afaict lintian does shout if you use cdb
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Section 7.6[1] is an often misunderstood/forgotten part of the Policy
> that explains how Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep are used to
> build a package. Here is almost a copy&paste:
> The dependencies and conflicts they define must be satisfied
Dear fellow developers,
Section 7.6[1] is an often misunderstood/forgotten part of the Policy
that explains how Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep are used to
build a package. Here is almost a copy&paste:
The dependencies and conflicts they define must be satisfied
in order to invoke
6 matches
Mail list logo