Re: FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION

1998-04-15 Thread John Goerzen
Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > John> Indeed. It happened to me again today. > > While watching my laptop shut-down last night, I noticed that mountd & nsfd > *do* get stopped prior to the PCMCIA shutdown. This is only

Re: FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION

1998-04-14 Thread Stephen Zander
> "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> Indeed. It happened to me again today. While watching my laptop shut-down last night, I noticed that mountd & nsfd *do* get stopped prior to the PCMCIA shutdown. Maybe they're just not getting stopped hard enough :) -- Stephen

Re: FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION

1998-04-13 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I actually originally reported it against sysvinit but he reassigned >it to mount. I have set its priority to critical because it can (and >HAS!) cause extensive data loss; definately not a wishlist issue! > >I will let the m

Re: FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION

1998-04-12 Thread John Goerzen
Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > No, that won't work if the NFS mounts live below the local mounts in > the file-system tree. The local mounts will report busy. Blat. You're right. > > John> * When I shutdown my desktop, it will hang trying to > John> umount. > > I sugge

Re: FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION

1998-04-12 Thread John Goerzen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kai Henningsen) writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Goerzen) wrote on 10.04.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Therefore, I believe it would be prudent, as a temporary workaround > > for the kernel bug, to umount all local drives before umounting > > network drives. It is general

Re: FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION

1998-04-11 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Goerzen) wrote on 10.04.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Therefore, I believe it would be prudent, as a temporary workaround > for the kernel bug, to umount all local drives before umounting > network drives. It is generally not a big deal if a network drive > doesn't get umo

Re: FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION

1998-04-11 Thread Stephen Zander
> "John" == John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [snip] John> not umount local drives. Therefore, I believe it would be John> prudent, as a temporary workaround for the kernel bug, to John> umount all local drives before umounting network drives. It No, that won't work if the

Re: FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION

1998-04-10 Thread John Goerzen
Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (speaking a 'mount' maintainer) > > I agree crash disks aren't fun at all, however from this email and from > your previous bug report, I fail to see where 'mount' is involved in this > infortunate process: Thanks for your reply, Vincent It w

Re: FILESYSTEM CORRUPTION

1998-04-10 Thread Vincent Renardias
[Following up on debian-devel] On Thu, 9 Apr 1998, John Goerzen wrote: > I reported a similar bug 33 days ago against mount (#19039). It has been > ignored by the maintainer of mount. I warned then, and I repeat today, > that this bug CAN and DOES cause filesystem corruption! >