Re: Emacs, RMS and sex(6)

1999-05-18 Thread Joey Hess
Joey Hess wrote: > > The emacs page is in section 6.. Maybe the funny manpages version should > > move to section 6 as well? > > That seems like an excellent idea. However, I think we might still have a more general problem with this type of man page conflict. A quick check of my local system tu

Re: Emacs, RMS and sex(6)

1999-05-18 Thread Joey Hess
Package: funny-manpages Joseph Carter wrote: > > Hm, here's something interesting. Funny-manpages and sex (the editor) both > > install a sex.1 manpage, in /usr/man and /usr/X11R6/man, respectively. Man > > seems to display the /usr/X11R6/man one in preference to the other. Unless > > you use man

Re: Emacs, RMS and sex(6)

1999-05-18 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 08:21:20PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > > The funny manpages (sex, condom, etc) are already in funny-manpages. > > They probably should NOT be in emacs. > > Hm, here's something interesting. Funny-manpages and sex (the editor) both > install a sex.1 manpage, in /usr/man and /

Re: Emacs, RMS and sex(6)

1999-05-18 Thread Joey Hess
Joseph Carter wrote: > The funny manpages (sex, condom, etc) are already in funny-manpages. > They probably should NOT be in emacs. Hm, here's something interesting. Funny-manpages and sex (the editor) both install a sex.1 manpage, in /usr/man and /usr/X11R6/man, respectively. Man seems to displa

Re: Emacs, RMS and sex(6)

1999-05-18 Thread Joseph Carter
The funny manpages (sex, condom, etc) are already in funny-manpages. They probably should NOT be in emacs. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Debian GNU/Linux developer PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBEThe Source Comes First! -

Re: The f-word in kernel source (Was: Re: Emacs, RMS and sex(6))

1999-05-18 Thread Steve Lamb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 18 May 1999 01:50:54 +0200 (CEST), Remco Blaakmeer wrote: >Just for the fun of it, I just counted how many times this word (or any >derivative of it) is mentioned in the 2.2.9 kernel source. I found 24 >files, with a total of 32 occurrences of

The f-word in kernel source (Was: Re: Emacs, RMS and sex(6))

1999-05-17 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Mon, 17 May 1999, Edward Betts wrote: > All food for thought. Finally on a slightly serious note, sex(6) is quite > explicit and some might find it offensive. We have fortune-off separate, so > people can leave it uninstalled. I suppose the kernel source does include the > word f*** a good few

Emacs, RMS and sex(6)

1999-05-17 Thread Edward Betts
I was looking at the new version of miscfiles, in the changelog, I noticed that the previous version (the one before this one)'s changelog entry read like this miscfiles (1.1-6) unstable; urgency=low * Removed duplication of the GNU Manifesto. closes: BUG#29565 -- Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PRO