On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 06:41:25PM -0500, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> >
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 07:56:31PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Hello Fabien!
Hello Marcus!
>
> On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 10:41:38AM -0500, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand you well but here is my opinions about freeness
> > of Documentation:
> >
> > Documentation descri
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > >
> > > Documentation may be include
Hello Fabien!
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 10:41:38AM -0500, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand you well but here is my opinions about freeness
> of Documentation:
>
> Documentation describing the functionnality of a software are dependant
> of the software. Then, they should be consid
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 01:22:33AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > Documentation may be included in main so long as there are no restrictions
> > on the unmodified use of the documentation
On Mon, Jun 08, 1998 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > >
> > > Documentation may be included in main so long as there are no restrictions
> > >
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (including the Linux/m68k FAQ, which isn't in Debian because it's
> not DFSG-free and I have no intention of making it DFSG-free),
Great Chris, but what happens if, God forbid, you (and Jörg) were to
be run over by a bus tomorrow? Your FAQ becomes wor
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dunno. But a lot of people have a copyright restriction in the document to
> make sure that the actual integrity of the standard remains intact (see, for
> example, the W3C's standards for HTTP and HTML).
This need is met by a "label is sacred" sort of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 8 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> > On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > Documentation may be included in main so long as there are no restrictions
> > on the unmodified use of the
On Jun 08, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I can't imagine why people are afraid that other people will change the
> standards. Why should anybody try to apply essential changes to, for
> example, the FSSTND?
Dunno. But a lot of people have a copyright restriction in the document to
make sure that the
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 08:42:14PM -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> Documentation may be included in main so long as there are no restrictions
> on the unmodified use of the documentation and no restrictions on
> translating the documentation to another format, pr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Santiago Vila Doncel, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>- From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 2 21:45:40 1998
>Date: 28 May 1998 22:02:52 -0400
>
>Once upon a time, I thought I would learn Perl. I got a copy of a
>free manual, but I found it simply unre
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [RMS article omitted because it may only be distributed "verbatim"; my
> quoting would violate his copyright]
No, fair use allows quotes.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
On Jun 06, Santiago Vila wrote:
> This could be more than what is really needed.
>
> I think we should just add a paragraph to the DFSG saying that although
> the DFSG applies to *software*, modifying the documentation for such
> software should be also allowed, in general, because otherwise the
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sat, 6 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I think:
>
> * We should treat documentation under the same terms as software, as we need
> it to use the software successfully and we'll have the same benefits of free
> documentation as we have of free software.
On Sat, Jun 06, 1998 at 11:54:26AM +0100, Jules Bean wrote:
> --On Fri, Jun 5, 1998 3:26 pm +0200 "Marcus Brinkmann"
>
> > [Marcus asked:]
> > It seems to imply, that I'm not allowed to derive a new license, using
> > portions of the GPL (even when changing the name). Is that correct?
>
--On Fri, Jun 5, 1998 3:26 pm +0200 "Marcus Brinkmann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> This is thereply I got from RMS about the copyright freeness issue.
>
> I think it is clear that we should lay the license freeness issue ad acta.
> Debian should include all licenses in whole, and
On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> This is thereply I got from RMS about the copyright freeness issue.
>
> I think it is clear that we should lay the license freeness issue ad acta.
> Debian should include all licenses in whole, and the dfsg should not exactly
> apply to
Hello!
This is thereply I got from RMS about the copyright freeness issue.
I think it is clear that we should lay the license freeness issue ad acta.
Debian should include all licenses in whole, and the dfsg should not exactly
apply to them.
Note that we require the dfsg-freeness for the benefi
19 matches
Mail list logo
