* Jari Aalto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061216 10:23]:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> But I feel that it is _wrong_ to close wishlist bugs like that. It
> >> is ok to tag them wontfix or help, or even usertag them send-patch,
> >> but closin
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
>> But I feel that it is _wrong_ to close wishlist bugs like that. It
>> is ok to tag them wontfix or help, or even usertag them send-patch,
>> but closing them immediately doesn't help anybody but statistics.
>
> I
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Marc Haber wrote:
> But I feel that it is _wrong_ to close wishlist bugs like that. It
> is ok to tag them wontfix or help, or even usertag them send-patch,
> but closing them immediately doesn't help anybody but statistics.
I personally don't close bugs capriciously either,[1
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:06:49 -0800, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:05:35AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> > If you're doing this, you better have already written (or gotten
>> > someone else to write) the patch to f
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:05:35AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > If you're doing this, you better have already written (or gotten
> > someone else to write) the patch to fix whatever bug you want
> > reopened and fixed; otherwise the ctte will likely c
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:05:35AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> If you disagree with a setting that a maintainer has specifically set,
> you should explain in an e-mail to the relevant bug that makes it
> clear why the state should be changed. If the maintainer is not
> convinced, then ask -devel
* Warren Turkal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061212 17:27]:
> On Tuesday 12 December 2006 04:05, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > [If you're doing this, you
> > better have already written (or gotten someone else to write) the
> > patch to fix whatever bug you want reopened and fixed; otherwise the
> > ctte will l
On Tuesday 12 December 2006 04:05, Don Armstrong wrote:
> [If you're doing this, you
> better have already written (or gotten someone else to write) the
> patch to fix whatever bug you want reopened and fixed; otherwise the
> ctte will likely close and ignore your bug report too.]
So even if it's
I normally wouldn't respond to -devel about this sort of thing, but
because this is the third time this week that someone has asked
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to deal with this sort of issue, I am. Please followup to
-devel, not this bug or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you disagree for some
reason.
On Mon, 11 D
9 matches
Mail list logo
