On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:15:39PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 3/25/19 11:41 AM, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 01:34:34PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> > > do not
On 3/25/19 11:41 AM, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 01:34:34PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
probably everything using pidof or pidof
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 01:34:34PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
> probably everything using pidof or pidofproc from /lib/lsb/init-\
> function
❦ 24 mars 2019 14:40 +01, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud :
>> Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern
>> is broken, it seems to be a low-effort solution.
>
> Vincent: what scenario did you have in mind?
For the first part, any daemon chrooting (like HAProxy, lldpd). For the
Le dimanche, 24 mars 2019, 09.42:12 h CET Geert Stappers a écrit :
> What would be the harm to the Buster release
> if lsb-base got NMU
> with
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=888743;filename=ini
> t-functions.diff;msg=37 ?
I have now uploaded src:lsb to experimental with
Hi Ondřej,
On 3/23/19 2:26 PM, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> since you are using non-default init system, I would recommend sending
> patches along with your bug reports if you want to get niche things fixed.
>
I already did. See the bug reports for lsb and opensmtpd. I
stumbled over apt-
On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 4:42 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 09:49:09PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:41 PM Harald Dunkel wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> > > do not care abo
❦ 24 mars 2019 09:42 +01, Geert Stappers :
> What would be the harm to the Buster release
> if lsb-base got NMU
> with
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=888743;filename=init-functions.diff;msg=37
> ?
Wouldn't it break chrooted processes? But mostly, as the whole pattern
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 09:49:09PM +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:41 PM Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> > do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
> > probably every
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 02:26:08PM +0100, Ond??ej Surý wrote:
> > On 23 Mar 2019, at 13:34, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> > do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
> > probably everythi
hi,
> since you are using non-default init system, I would recommend sending
> patches along with your bug reports if you want to get niche things fixed.
not every package uses systemd yet, for some systemd still calls init
scripts which do various kinds of broken things.
So thats not necessaril
On Mar 23, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
> probably everything using pidof or pidofproc from /lib/lsb/init-\
> functions).
I routinely use containers and namespaces with
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 8:41 PM Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
> do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
> probably everything using pidof or pidofproc from /lib/lsb/init-\
> functions).
>
> I
Hi Harald,
since you are using non-default init system, I would recommend sending
patches along with your bug reports if you want to get niche things fixed.
Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ond...@sury.org
> On 23 Mar 2019, at 13:34, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> AFAICS there are several pack
Hi folks,
AFAICS there are several packages that appear to be unaware of /
do not care about containers, e.g. opensmtpd, bind9, apt-cacher-ng,
probably everything using pidof or pidofproc from /lib/lsb/init-\
functions).
I noticed that containerization and Linux namespaces are not number
one prio
15 matches
Mail list logo
