Bug#521893: ITP: linux-patch-preemptrt -- The CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT Patch Sets for various Debian kernels

2009-03-30 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
: The CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT Patch Sets for various Debian kernels This patch allows nearly all of the kernel to be preempted, with the exception of a few very small regions of code. The goal of these patch sets is to guarantee an upper bound for the system's latencies. It's interesting e.g. for

Re: debian kernels and APM poweroff

2006-10-25 Thread Henning Glawe
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:01:04AM +0200, Henning Glawe wrote: > A possible solution is to put > > options apm poweroff > argh. stupid typo. should be: options apm power_off -- c u henning signature.asc Description: Digital signature

debian kernels and APM poweroff

2006-10-25 Thread Henning Glawe
Moin, there is one issue with the newer debian kernels, as they have SMP enabled: as documented in bugs #376089 and #378323, apm poweroff does not work anymore. A possible solution is to put options apm poweroff somewhere under /etc/modprobe.d/ and regenerate the initrd. IMHO it would

Re: Debian kernels

2005-05-30 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 20:36 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > 1) What's the timeframe? Should it be available for Sarge, so it needs > > >quick packaging? [...] > Uh, I don't care how quickly you package it, we're not promoting a totally > new package from unstable to stable in the space of a

Re: Debian kernels

2005-05-29 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 07:21:41AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Monday 30 May 2005 06:01, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (*) I don't have time to take on another package at the moment. But I > > > would be happy to help someone who wants to package auditd. > > I have a l

Re: Debian kernels

2005-05-29 Thread Russell Coker
On Monday 30 May 2005 06:01, Laszlo Boszormenyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (*) I don't have time to take on another package at the moment. But I > > would be happy to help someone who wants to package auditd. > > I have a little time and would like to package auditd. There are two > problems

Re: Debian kernels

2005-05-29 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 16:09 +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > The option CONFIG_AUDIT needs to be enabled to allow SE Linux access denials > to be logged, without this it is impossible to use SE Linux. While making > such changes enabling the option CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL would be useful, this > enabl

Debian kernels

2005-05-28 Thread Russell Coker
The current Debian kernels have SE Linux compiled in, but not in a form that is usable. The option CONFIG_AUDIT needs to be enabled to allow SE Linux access denials to be logged, without this it is impossible to use SE Linux. While making such changes enabling the option CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL

Fwd: Bug#219258: openmosix patches do not apply cleanly to debian kernels

2003-11-06 Thread Daniel Rogério de Souza
It's rather obnoxious that he makes changes that > would cause problems like this in minor revisions. > > Of course, the other problem is that if I hack up the patch to apply > against the Debian kernels it probably won't apply against the > mainstream ones, which are the ones