On Mon Mar 31, 2025 at 10:56 PM BST, CrypticVerse wrote:
I am sorry if this was said earlier and I did not catch it,
but I cannot find the reasoning behind the closure of this ITP.
Can someone tell me just a bit more about that?
Again, I am sorry if this was already mentioned
I've re-opened it
Hello,
I am sorry if this was said earlier and I did not catch it,
but I cannot find the reasoning behind the closure of this ITP.
Can someone tell me just a bit more about that?
Again, I am sorry if this was already mentioned
Thanks!
---
Luka
On Thu Mar 27, 2025 at 12:50 PM GMT, Simon Josefsson wrote:
To me this looks like it can be a useful package, if it isn't already,
and it looks fine for inclusion into Debian.
Apologies to Luka, I should not describe it as "clearly not suitable".
--
Please do not CC me for listmail.
👱🏻 J
Hi,
Yes, I have looked into the 'dh-make' tool. From what I've seen, it
generated too many files that were not needed to compile the program.
'dh-make', for me, also left a lot of fields that needed to be manually
edited later on. My tool takes in user input a bit more than 'dh-make', so
it can wri
epage and attempt to create a debian/* template a missing
tool to faciliate Debian package creation.
The thing is, there are already a lot of them:
https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticPackagingTools
--
Nicolas Peugnet
ch would could an upstream tarball and/or
>> a URL to a homepage and attempt to create a debian/* template a missing
>> tool to faciliate Debian package creation.
>
> The thing is, there are already a lot of them:
> https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticPackagingTools
The only languag
t Go-specific which would could an upstream tarball and/or
a URL to a homepage and attempt to create a debian/* template a missing
tool to faciliate Debian package creation.
/Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed Mar 26, 2025 at 7:12 PM GMT, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
Please stop this series of troll packages.
I think characterising this as trolling is unfair. Clearly this is not
suitable for inclusion in Debian, but, what isn't clear is Luka's
intent. It looks to me that they are making a genuin
e/package-assembler
> * License : GPL-3
> Programming Lang: Python
> Description : CLI tool to create necessary files for a Debian package
>
> The CLI tool simplifies the creation and modification of necessary
> metadata files
> for building and creating Debian packages.
: GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : CLI tool to create necessary files for a Debian package
The CLI tool simplifies the creation and modification of necessary metadata
files
for building and creating Debian packages. Based on user input, it can generate
the control
Control: tags 1032150 wontfix
Hello Blake,
(Dropping several mails from CC, as those are the wrong adressees for
the topic; Adding the ITP bug though, as the discussion should happen
there.)
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:42:18AM -0600, Blake Gilbert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Blake Gilbert an
Hi,
On 12-01-2024 16:42, Blake Gilbert wrote:
I am reaching out to you regarding a recent package submission by our
Engine Connectivity Engineering team. We submitted the package CDImage
M-LINUX-WolframEngine.DEB a few months ago to include Wolfram Engine in
Debian packages, and I wanted to se
Hello,
My name is Blake Gilbert and I work in the partnerships group at Wolfram
Research.
I am reaching out to you regarding a recent package submission by our Engine
Connectivity Engineering team. We submitted the package CDImage
M-LINUX-WolframEngine.DEB a few months ago to include Wolfram
At 2023-11-15T14:58:15+, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> I replied to you there too, but you still never seemed to be able to
> explain... why do you need to put an OpenPGP key on the service
> you're using to upload Python packages (not Debian packages) to
> PyPI, given that PyPI doesn't support uploa
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 09:41:12 -0800
Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Oh, indeed, you're right and I misread that. So I think you can just use
> symlinks, period, and not worry about .so (although you have to handle
> nodoc builds correctly).
>
Well, one file with a list like
```debian/markdownlint.man
Andrey Rakhmatullin writes:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:44:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The good news is that if you're using debhelper, you don't have to care
>> about how man handles these indirections and can just use a symlink.
>> Install the man page into usr/share/man/man1 under what
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 11:44:06AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The good news is that if you're using debhelper, you don't have to care
> about how man handles these indirections and can just use a symlink.
> Install the man page into usr/share/man/man1 under whatever name is
> canonical (possibly
Norwid Behrnd writes:
> Recently, I started to upgrade the Debian package about
> `markdownlint`,[1] a syntax checker. The initially packaged version
> 0.12.0 provided a binary of name `ruby-mdl` which now becomes a
> transition dummy package in favour of the function
Hello,
On Sat, 11 Nov 2023 14:08:49 +0100
Alexander Sulfrian wrote:
>
> You will need a file mdl.1 with the following content:
>
> .so man1/markdownlint.1
>
> and markdownlint.1 should be the normal manpage without a .so line.
>
This logic provides exactly the relay I sought out. Thanks a
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 08:20:35PM +0100, Norwid Behrnd wrote:
> However, there still is some detail I did not understand well enough; the
> additional line
>
> .so man1/mdl.1
>
> in my file /debian/markdownlint.1
I think you missunderstodd the instructions:
> Here is how to do it: If y
Hi,
On 2023/11/11 3:20, Norwid Behrnd wrote:
Hello,
I seek a maintained Debian package which provides multiple binaries sharing one
man page in common -- do you know an example?
Vim is an example of this, if I recalled it right - Vim has multiple
frontends, there is a CLI one and a GTK one
On 11/11/23 08:12, Tobias Frost wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 08:20:35PM +0100, Norwid Behrnd wrote:
I seek a maintained Debian package which provides multiple binaries sharing one
man page in common -- do you know an example?
devscripts - it links debchange.1 to dch.1 via debian/links
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 08:20:35PM +0100, Norwid Behrnd wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I seek a maintained Debian package which provides multiple binaries sharing
> one
> man page in common -- do you know an example?
devscripts - it links debchange.1 to dch.1 via debian/links (dh_link
Am 10. November 2023 20:20:35 MEZ schrieb Norwid Behrnd :
>Hello,
>
>I seek a maintained Debian package which provides multiple binaries sharing one
>man page in common -- do you know an example?
>
faust
mfh.her.fsr
IOhannes
Hello,
I seek a maintained Debian package which provides multiple binaries sharing one
man page in common -- do you know an example?
Recently, I started to upgrade the Debian package about `markdownlint`,[1] a
syntax checker. The initially packaged version 0.12.0 provided a binary of
name `ruby
Quoting Robert Ernst (2023-05-05 08:24:00)
> I already sent a MR a week ago. But the maintainer ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)
> replied with cryptic messages via E-Mail, never
> accepted the Merge Request and then stopped replying to mails. I also
> would be interested to have progress here.
Please ha
On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 06:24:00AM +, Robert Ernst wrote:
> Hello Martin,
>
> thank you for creating Bug report #1035528
>
> The missing update might be due to a broken watchfile.
> I already sent a MR a week ago. But the maintainer ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)
> replied with cryptic messages via E
Hello Martin,
thank you for creating Bug report #1035528
The missing update might be due to a broken watchfile.
I already sent a MR a week ago. But the maintainer ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬)
replied with cryptic messages via E-Mail, never
accepted the Merge Request and then stopped replying to mail
Hi all,
I am reaching out to kindly ask for your assistance in providing
feedback on the native debian package of GitLab.
We have created a survey to gather feedback on the native debian package
of GitLab. The survey aims to gather information on the usage of GitLab,
the satisfaction with
+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Manifest style debian package builder
Binary package being dh-debputy:
Package builder that provides a declarative manifest for building
debian packages.
This version integrates with the debhelper sequencer dh and will
replace several of
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-lint-ma...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:lintian
The lintian package is now orphaned as both of the people
who were actively working on lintian have stopped that work:
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-sear
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:52:08AM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > It only makes sense to use '+maria~deb11' if you are going to
> > also release '+maria' that needs to sort after all of those, or if you are
> > using/going to use some '+maria+foo' scheme(s) that, again, need to sort
> > after a
from upstream
> > version control not from official release tag.
Use suffix "+maria1" (where "1" is bumped for each new release you make derived
from same Debian package.
> It only makes sense to use '+maria~deb11' if you are going to
> also release &#
On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 10:22:55AM +0300, Tuukka Pasanen wrote:
> After reading couple times Debian Policy documentation packaging conventions
> and especially'5.6.12.2. Special version conventions' chapter. I'm bit
> confused about revision system. As MariaDB Foundation wants to provide
> upstream
Hi Tuukka,
* Tuukka Pasanen [2022-05-20 10:22]:
Currently revision is for example: '10.6.7+maria~buster' which
upgrades '10.6.7+maria~bullseye' which is lexical orderly lower than
first one.To understand this bug report can be found here:
https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-28628 which conta
Hello,
After reading couple times Debian Policy documentation packaging
conventions and especially'5.6.12.2. Special version conventions'
chapter. I'm bit confused about revision system. As MariaDB Foundation
wants to provide upstream packages and currently naming scheme conflicts
when upgrad
I have two Debian servers: one is buster and one is bullseye. They both
run the openafs-client service. When I run "gbp buildpackage mypackage"
it completes successfully on both servers as long as the directory where
I run "gbp" is _not_ in AFS. If I run "gbp" in an AFS directory it
completes s
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:19:23PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:12:37AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> > Would you agree that there is an issue with sudo access that is enabled
> > by default on most Debian and Debian-based distributions? The bug may
> > not be in apt, b
Philipp Kern writes:
> You know that this is a bad idea (granting sudo to apt without a
> wrapper). I know that this is a bad idea. That was my point. Plus that
> this is a very common trope in multi-user settings that you want to hand
> out some privilege to install packages.
Right, but this is
On 2021-08-12 17:56, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:44:24 +0200, Philipp Kern
wrote:
On 2021-08-12 12:23, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
Now if people start doing stuff they don't master than it's not
privilege escalation but much more something like another
manifestation
o
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:19:23PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> if those users are not trustworthy than the bug is giving them sudo,
> nothing else. (Debian does not give sudo to users by default. The default
> is to set a root password.)
>
> if you give someone a gun for hunting (animals) and th
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:44:24 +0200, Philipp Kern
wrote:
>On 2021-08-12 12:23, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
>> Now if people start doing stuff they don't master than it's not
>> privilege escalation but much more something like another manifestation
>> of human stupidity. And this, there
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:12:37AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> Would you agree that there is an issue with sudo access that is enabled
> by default on most Debian and Debian-based distributions? The bug may
> not be in apt, but it definitely lives somewhere.
if those users are not trustworthy t
> The focus of the article is "sudo access *only* to apt". When we talk
> about unrestricted sudo access it doesn't even make sense to talk about
> privilege escalation because unrestricted sudo is by design a privilege
> escalation.
Similarly, sudo access *only* to bash enables execution of loads
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 08:35:42AM -0400, Kyle Edwards wrote:
> > > > I just ran across this article
> > > > https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
> > > > the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
> > > > shell prompt.
> > > I don't think
On 8/12/21 2:32 AM, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 12 August 2021 10:39 +05, Andrey Rahmatullin:
I just ran across this article
https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
shell prompt.
I don't think cal
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 08:32:14AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 12 August 2021 10:39 +05, Andrey Rahmatullin:
> >> I just ran across this article
> >> https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
> >> the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a roo
On 2021-08-12 12:23, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
Now if people start doing stuff they don't master than it's not
privilege escalation but much more something like another manifestation
of human stupidity. And this, there won't be a number of article
sufficient to make people change.
[
Hi,
On 2021-08-12 2:25 a.m., Brian Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-08-12 at 11:19 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:12:37AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
>>> Would you agree that there is an issue with sudo access that is
>>> enabled
>>> by default on most Debian and Deb
On 2021-08-12 08:32, Vincent Bernat wrote:
❦ 12 August 2021 10:39 +05, Andrey Rahmatullin:
I just ran across this article
https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I
tested
the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
shell prompt.
I don't think cal
❦ 12 August 2021 10:31 +02, Ansgar:
>> I give myself password less sudo to "apt update" (without additional
>> options), "apt upgrade" (same), "apt full-upgrade" (same). I was
>> thinking this should be safe, but now I need to check if the pager is
>> properly restricted when displaying NEWS file
On Thu, 2021-08-12 at 08:32 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> I give myself password less sudo to "apt update" (without additional
> options), "apt upgrade" (same), "apt full-upgrade" (same). I was
> thinking this should be safe, but now I need to check if the pager is
> properly restricted when displ
❦ 12 August 2021 11:38 +05, Andrey Rahmatullin:
>> >> I just ran across this article
>> >> https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
>> >> the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
>> >> shell prompt.
>> > I don't think calling this "privile
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:25:06AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On Thu, 2021-08-12 at 11:19 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:12:37AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> > > Would you agree that there is an issue with
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 08:32:14AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >> I just ran across this article
> >> https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
> >> the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
> >> shell prompt.
> > I don't think calling this
❦ 12 August 2021 10:39 +05, Andrey Rahmatullin:
>> I just ran across this article
>> https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
>> the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
>> shell prompt.
> I don't think calling this "privilege escalation"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2021-08-12 at 11:19 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:12:37AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> > Would you agree that there is an issue with sudo access that is
> > enabled
> > by default on most Debian and Debian-ba
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:17:03AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> > > Thank you for bringing this to everyone's attention. This are very
> > > real
> > > vulnerabilities.
> > How are they vulnerabilities?
> They are vulnerabilities because the user is susceptible to this kind of
> attack by defaul
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 01:12:37AM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> Would you agree that there is an issue with sudo access that is enabled
> by default on most Debian and Debian-based distributions? The bug may
> not be in apt, but it definitely lives somewhere.
Do you think "sudo access" itself is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2021-08-12 at 10:44 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:55:44PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> > Thank you for bringing this to everyone's attention. This are very
> > real
> > vulnerabilities.
> How are they vulner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 2021-08-12 at 07:38 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Timothy M Butterworth:
> > All,
> >
> > I just ran across this article
> > https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I
> > tested
> > the attacks on Debian 11 and they wor
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:55:44PM -0500, Brian Thompson wrote:
> Thank you for bringing this to everyone's attention. This are very real
> vulnerabilities.
How are they vulnerabilities?
> NPM has similar issues with stopping malicious packages from being
> published to the FTP server.
That's no
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 11:30:27PM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> I just ran across this article
> https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
> the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
> shell prompt.
I don't think calling this "privile
Timothy M Butterworth:
> All,
>
> I just ran across this article
> https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
> the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
> shell prompt.
>
> Tim
>
Hi Tim,
All of the attacks presented assumes that the local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Wed, 2021-08-11 at 23:30 -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> All,
>
> I just ran across this article
> https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
> the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
All,
I just ran across this article
https://blog.ikuamike.io/posts/2021/package_managers_privesc/ I tested
the attacks on Debian 11 and they work successfully giving me a root
shell prompt.
Tim
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:59:25PM +0530, Manikant Singh wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I am IIT Kanpur student. I am trying to build debian package from source
> code after making some changes to it.
> Though I am able to make changes and build debian package successfully,
> some
Hi Team,
I am IIT Kanpur student. I am trying to build debian package from source
code after making some changes to it.
Though I am able to make changes and build debian package successfully,
some of the changes are not reflected.
I made changes to corefile.c which are correctly reflected
But
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: nagios-tang
Version : 7
Upstream Author : Nathaniel McCallum
* URL : https://github.com/latchset/nagios-tang/
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: C
Description : A Nagios plugin to check the h
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the debtags package.
The package description is:
debtags extracts tag information from the apt database and makes it available
to the system, either in /var/lib/debtags/debtags or via apt-xapian-index.
.
Package tags are cat
Dear all,
I prepared a debian package for go-sendxmpp [1] as well as for the
dependencies getopt [2] and mattn/go-xmpp [3].
It would be nice if someone could check them and add them to debian if
all is well. If not I'd appreciate any feedback.
Best regards,
Martin
[1]
Control: reassign -1 wnpp
Control: retitle -1 ITP: node-markdown-it -- fast and easy to extend markdown
parser
On Ma, 11 feb 20, 13:05:08, Sakshi Sangwan wrote:
> Package: markdown-it
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sakshi Sangwan
>
> * Package name: node-markdown-it
> Version : 10.
Package: markdown-it
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sakshi Sangwan
* Package name: node-markdown-it
Version : 10.0.0
Upstream Author : Vitaly Puzrin, Alex Kocharin
* URL : https://github.com/markdown-it/markdown-it#readme
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: JavaSc
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 11:53:28PM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:21 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 06:51, Carsten Behling wrote:
> > >
> > > I get the following error while trying to rebuild
> > > 'qtbase-opensource-src_5.7.1+dfs
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:21 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 06:51, Carsten Behling wrote:
> >
> > I get the following error while trying to rebuild
> > 'qtbase-opensource-src_5.7.1+dfsg-3+deb9u1' for Debian Stretch armhf in a
> > pbuilder environment:
>
> q
Hi Carsten!
On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 06:51, Carsten Behling
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I get the following error while trying to rebuild
> 'qtbase-opensource-src_5.7.1+dfsg-3+deb9u1' for Debian Stretch armhf in a
> pbuilder environment:
qtbase can't be cross built "as is" in Stretch, and possibly not in
Hi,
I get the following error while trying to rebuild
'qtbase-opensource-src_5.7.1+dfsg-3+deb9u1' for Debian Stretch armhf in a
pbuilder environment:
...
g++ -c -pipe -O2 -Wall -W -fPIC -I. -I../../../mkspecs/linux-g++ -o db2.o
db2.cpp
db2.cpp:40:20: fatal error: sqlcli.h: No such file or direct
ges you specify other debian packages to install, they
must exist in debian.
For other files, during package creation you create/copy files in a a dir
representing the final install (/usr... /var...) and at package install
they are placed in those locations.
There are rules where to place files etc.. in d
Thanks,
There is a small problem I'm facing is how to handle the installer bash
script?
how can I run it during installation? Its function is to install python
dependencies,
creating configuration files and desktop shortcut. Please have a look at it
https://github.com/osdag-admin/UbuntuInstaller/bl
On 2019, ജൂലൈ 4 8:50:25 PM IST, himanshu Singh wrote:
>Hi, I am working on a project named Osdag. It is open-source software
>for
>the design of steel structures. I'm trying to create a Debian package
>for
>it and planning to add to Debian package repository. It would
Le jeu. 4 juil. 2019 à 18:31, Mindaugas Celiesius a
écrit :
>
>
> > Hi, I am working on a project named Osdag. It is open-source software
> for the design of steel structures. I'm trying to create a Debian package
> for it and planning to add to Debian package repository
> Hi, I am working on a project named Osdag. It is open-source software for the
> design of steel structures. I'm trying to create a Debian package for it and
> planning to add to Debian package repository. It would be a great help if
> someone could create a package for
Hi, I am working on a project named Osdag. It is open-source software for
the design of steel structures. I'm trying to create a Debian package for
it and planning to add to Debian package repository. It would be a great
help if someone could create a package for us or help us to create that
Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
[2019-02-21 00:00] Guillem Jover
On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 19:37:38 +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Bogatov
* Package name : build-alternative
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov
* Url
On 22.02.19 12:44, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> [2019-02-21 00:00] Guillem Jover
>> On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 19:37:38 +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>>> Package: wnpp
>>> Severity: wishlist
>>> Owner: Dmitry Bogatov
>>>
>>> * Package name : build-alternative
>>> Version : 0.0.1
>>> Upst
[2019-02-21 00:00] Guillem Jover
> On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 19:37:38 +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Dmitry Bogatov
> >
> > * Package name : build-alternative
> > Version : 0.0.1
> > Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov
> > * Url
Hi!
On Mon, 2019-02-18 at 19:37:38 +, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Dmitry Bogatov
>
> * Package name : build-alternative
> Version : 0.0.1
> Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov
> * Url : https://salsa.debian.org/kaction/buil
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitry Bogatov
* Package name : build-alternative
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov
* Url : https://salsa.debian.org/kaction/build-alternative
* Licenses : GPL-3+
Programming Lang : shell
Section
On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 9:25 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Adrian Nuta 于2018年8月30日周四 下午6:38写道：
>> Meanwhile, Sphinx got a major release, but it's only distributed as free
>> binaries, not open-source and the old, open-source version is not
>> maintained anymore.
Some context for those (like me) who
the original project) and
> we continue from where the last open source version left.
>
> My question for you is if you are interested to be maintainer for a manticore
> debian package, as you worked with the sphinx before. We did some upgrades to
> our compiling scripts, as now it
Hello,
On 29/08/2018 15:18, Tudor Suciu wrote:
> libsrt is a useful library for live video broadcasts. It is already
> integrated in ffmpeg, gstreamer and vlc.
> I propose this debian package for inclusion:
> https://bitbucket.org/tudorsuciu/srt
> Please tell me if you have issu
Hello,
libsrt is a useful library for live video broadcasts. It is already
integrated in ffmpeg, gstreamer and vlc.
I propose this debian package for inclusion:
https://bitbucket.org/tudorsuciu/srt
Please tell me if you have issues generating a deb package/integrating with
ffmpeg/gstreamer/vlc
On Thu, 2018-08-23 at 13:50 +0200, Andreas Jakowidis wrote:
> Running "mobius actioncam/dashcam" on debian "officially" - Creation
> of a necessary official debian-package?
Hello!
The mobius cam is great, excellent quality for the price! I have one
and it's so sma
Running "mobius actioncam/dashcam" on debian "officially" - Creation of a necessary official debian-package?Exists some official driver/package, that makes mobius actioncam/dashcam running on debian OS?Without "Wine", "KVM", oder "Oracle Virtualbox
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kurian Benoy
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-date-time
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com)
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/date-time#readme
* License
+
Description : Automated Debian package updater
Debian's Automated Developer (Dad) is a program preparing updates
for Debian packages automating repetitive tasks of human Developers.
The automated tasks include:
* updating packages to new upstream versions refreshing patches
* updating sy
+
Programming Lang: shell script
Description : Oracle SQL Developer Command-Line Debian package builder
This utility makes it possible to build a Debian package from Oracle SQL
Developer Command-Line (SQLcl). The Oracle SQL Developer program is
governed by the copyright holder (Oracle USA, Inc.), so
upstream author
> * URL : https://github.com/rvagg/node-worker-farm
> * License : Expat
> Programming Lang: JavaScript
> Description : FIX_ME write the Debian package description
Please change all FIX_ME before sending the ITP mail. You are supposed
to read
Programming Lang: JavaScript
Description : FIX_ME write the Debian package description
FIX_ME: This ITP report is not ready for submission, until you are
confident this package description is ready for Debian.
.
Write the short and long descriptions for the Debian package as
explained in
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> I seem to remember some more tech info is in the HN thread:
>
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11390545
Actually it was this one:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11388418
Re fork, they implemented that in the Windows kernel and expo
1 - 100 of 580 matches
Mail list logo
